- What it means to respect individuality.Xiaofei Liu & Ye Liang - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (8):2579-2598.details
|
|
Introduction: systematicity, the nature of science?Hasok Chang, Simon Lohse & Karim Bschir - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):761-773.details
|
|
Introduction to values and pluralism in the environmental sciences: From inferences to institutions.Zachary Piso & Viorel Pâslaru - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (C):140-144.details
|
|
Disagreement or denialism? “Invasive species denialism” and ethical disagreement in science.David M. Frank - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6085-6113.details
|
|
Making the abstract concrete: The role of norms and values in experimental modeling.Isabelle F. Peschard & Bas C. van Fraassen - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:3-10.details
|
|
Risk and Values in Science: A Peircean View.Daniele Chiffi & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2019 - Axiomathes 29 (4):329-346.details
|
|
Values and evidence: how models make a difference.Wendy S. Parker & Eric Winsberg - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (1):125-142.details
|
|
Values and uncertainties in climate prediction, revisited.Wendy Parker - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:24-30.details
|
|
Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, James Moor, and John Weckert , Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐Interscience , 385 pp., $42.50. [REVIEW]Kevin C. Elliott - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (3):405-409.details
|
|
“Antiscience Zealotry”? Values, Epistemic Risk, and the GMO Debate.Justin B. Biddle - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (3):360-379.details
|
|
Inductive risk and epistemically detrimental dissent in policy-relevant science.Tyler Paetkau - 2024 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14 (1):1-20.details
|
|
Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability.Martin Carrier - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):439-464.details
|
|
Non-Empirical Uncertainties in Evidence-Based Decision Making.Malvina Ongaro & Mattia Andreoletti - 2022 - Perspectives on Science 30 (2):305-320.details
|
|
Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science.Matteo Colombo, Leandra Bucher & Yoel Inbar - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):743-763.details
|
|
The irreducibility of value-freedom to theory assessment.Anke Bueter - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:18-26.details
|
|
Science and Tradition: Towards a Pluralistic Scientific Society.Amir Motesharei & Mostafa Taqavi - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (37):242-270.details
|
|
Environmental Ethics.Roberta L. Millstein - 2013 - In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: a Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.details
|
|
Science Advice in an Environment of Trust: Trusted, but Not Trustworthy?Torbjørn Gundersen & Cathrine Holst - 2022 - Social Epistemology 36 (5):629-640.details
|
|
Value disputes in urban ecological restoration: Lessons from the Chicago Wilderness.Ben Almassi - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 87 (C):93-100.details
|
|
Inductive Risk and OxyContin: The Ethics of Evidence and Post-Market Surveillance of Pharmaceuticals in Canada.Itai Bavli & Daniel Steel - 2020 - Public Health Ethics 13 (3):300-313.details
|
|
The myth and fallacy of simple extrapolation in medicine.Jonathan Fuller - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):2919-2939.details
|
|
Boorse’s Theory of Disease: (Why) Do Values Matter?Brent M. Kious - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (4):421-438.details
|
|
How biological background assumptions influence scientific risk evaluation of stacked genetically modified plants: an analysis of research hypotheses and argumentations.Fredrik Andersen & Elena Rocca - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-20.details
|
|
Causal Concepts Guiding Model Specification in Systems Biology.Dana Matthiessen - 2017 - Disputatio 9 (47):499-527.details
|
|
Null hypothesis testing ≠ Scientific inference: A critique of the shaky premise at the heart of the science and values debate, and a defense of value‐neutral risk assessment.Brian H. MacGillivray - forthcoming - Risk Analysis.details
|
|
Political Legitimacy in the Democratic View: The Case of Climate Services.Greg Lusk - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):991-1002.details
|
|
Values and Decisions: Cognitive and Noncognitive Values in Knowledge Generation and Decision Making.José Luis Luján & Oliver Todt - 2014 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (5):720-743.details
|
|
Standards of evidence and causality in regulatory science: Risk and benefit assessment.José Luis Luján & Oliver Todt - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80 (C):82-89.details
|
|
Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences.Simon Lohse, Martin S. Wasmer & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (6):700-736.details
|
|
How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values.Caleb L. Linville, Aidan C. Cairns, Tyler Garcia, Bill Bridges, Jonathan Herington, James T. Laverty & Scott Tanona - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (3):1-23.details
|
|
The division of advisory labour: the case of ‘mitochondrial donation’.Tim Lewens - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (1):10.details
|
|
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation: On the situation of women in science and philosophy.Anna Leuschner - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:56-63.details
|
|
Quoten für Hauptvorträge? Moralische, soziale und epistemische Aspekte akademischer Quotenregelungen am Beispiel der Gendered Conference Campaign.Anna Leuschner - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 7 (1):325-346.details
|
|
Pluralism and objectivity: Exposing and breaking a circle.Anna Leuschner - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):191-198.details
|
|
Literaturessay.Anna Leuschner - 2012 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60 (2):285-295.details
|
|
Why science cannot be value-free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.details
|
|
Non-cognitive Values: A Warrant of the Rationality and Responsibility of Science.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2022 - Ruch Filozoficzny 77 (4):11-22.details
|
|
The Four Analytic Levels of Social Sciences.Ricardo Crespo - 2023 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 24 (2):93-127.details
|
|
Delimiting the Proper Scope of Epistemology.Rebecca Kukla - 2015 - Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1):202-216.details
|
|
Miksi tieteilijöiden kannattaa tehdä yhteistyötä taiteilijoiden kanssa.Inkeri Koskinen - 2018 - Ajatus 75:93–119.details
|
|
Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity.Inkeri Koskinen - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1187-1207.details
|
|
Live empirical issues in debates over objectivity in the social sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):1935-1954.details
|
|
What Is Unique About Nanomedicine? The Significance of the Mesoscale.George Khushf & Ronald A. Siegel - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):780-794.details
|
|
Adjusting Inferential Thresholds to Reflect Nonepistemic Values.Kim Kaivanto & Daniel Steel - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (2):255-285.details
|
|
On the conditions for objectivity : how to avoid bias in socially relevant research.Saana Jukola - unknowndetails
|
|
Commercial interests, agenda setting, and the epistemic trustworthiness of nutrition science.Saana Jukola - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 10):2629-2646.details
|
|
Inference and Inductive Risk in Disorders of Consciousness.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (1):35-43.details
|
|
A Critical Evaluation of Value-Free Science Based on the Induction Risk Argument.Gholam Hossien Javadpoor - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 22 (2):73-95.details
|
|
Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets.Mathias Frisch - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):979-990.details
|
|
Epistemic redress.George Hull - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-21.details
|
|