Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Components of probabilistic support: The two-proposition case.P. T. Landsberg & J. Wise - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):402-414.
    Support functions $s(h,e)=p(h\backslash e)-p(h)$ are widely used in discussion of explanation, causality and, recently, in connection with the possibility or otherwise of probabilistic induction. With this latter application in view, a rather complete analysis of the variety of support functions, their interrelationships and their "non-deductive" and "inductive" components is presented. With the restriction to two propositions, three variable probabilities are enough to discuss such problems. The analysis is illustrated by graphs, a Venn diagram and by using the Laplace Rule of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Some further reflections on the Popper-Miller 'disproof' of probabilistic induction.Colin Howson - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):221 – 228.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On a recent objection to Popper and Miller's "disproof" of probabilistic induction.Colin Howson - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680.
    Dunn and Hellman's objection to Popper and Miller's alleged disproof of inductive probability is considered and rejected. Dunn and Hellman base their objection on a decomposition of the incremental support P(h/e)-P(h) of h by e dual to that of Popper and Miller, and argue, dually to Popper and Miller, to a conclusion contrary to the latters' that all support is deductive in character. I contend that Dunn and Hellman's dualizing argument fails because the elements of their decomposition are not supports (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • J. Michael Dunn on Information Based Logics.Katalin Bimbo (ed.) - 2016 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
    This book celebrates and expands on J. Michael Dunn’s work on informational interpretations of logic. Dunn, in his Ph.D. thesis, introduced a semantics for first-degree entailments utilizing the idea that a sentence can provide positive or negative information about a topic, possibly supplying both or neither. He later published a related interpretation of the logic R-mingle, which turned out to be one of the first relational semantics for a relevance logic. An incompatibility relation between information states lends itself to a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Probabilité et support inductif. Sur le théorème de Popper-Miller.Guillaume Rochefort-Maranda - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (3):499-526.
    In 1983, in an open letter to the journal Nature, Karl Popper and David Miller set forth a particularly strong critical argument which sought to demonstrate the impossibility of inductive probability. Since its publication the argument has faced many criticisms and we argue in this article that they do not reach their objectives. We will first reconstruct the demonstration made by Popper and Miller in their initial article and then try to evaluate the main arguments against it. Although it is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Partly deductive support in the Popper-Miller argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.
    Popper and Miller (1983) have presented an argument purporting to establish the impossibility of inductive probability. Here I discuss critically their characterization of a deductive part of nondeductive support, a point that has not figured centrally in previous responses.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An interchange on the Popper-Miller argument.Charles S. Chihara & Donald A. Gillies - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 54 (1):1 - 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Logique inductive et soutien probabiliste.Denis Zwirn & Hervé Zwirn - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (2):293-.
    Karl Popper et David Miller ont soutenu l'idée selon laquelle le soutien probabiliste positif = p − p > 0) que e apporte á h, lorsque de h on déduit e, ne justifie en rien l'espoir de pouvoir construire une logique inductive fondée sur le calcul des probabilityés.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Probabilistic support, probabilistic induction and bayesian confirmation theory.Andres Rivadulla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):477-483.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations