Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect.Aileen Oeberst & Hartmut Blank - 2012 - Cognition 125 (2):141-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Emotion and False Memory.Robin L. Kaplan, Ilse Van Damme, Linda J. Levine & Elizabeth F. Loftus - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (1):8-13.
    Emotional memories are vivid and lasting but not necessarily accurate. Under some conditions, emotion even increases people’s susceptibility to false memories. This review addresses when and why emotion leaves people vulnerable to misremembering events. Recent research suggests that pregoal emotions—those experienced before goal attainment or failure (e.g., hope, fear)—narrow the scope of people’s attention to information that is central to their goals. This narrow focus can impair memory for peripheral details, leaving people vulnerable to misinformation concerning those details. In contrast, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Promoting eyewitness testimony quality: Warning vs. reinforced self-affirmation as methods of reduction of the misinformation effect.Romuald Polczyk & Malwina Szpitalak - 2013 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 44 (1):85-91.
    In a typical experiment on the misinformation effect, subjects first watch some event, afterwards read a description of it which in the experimental group includes some incorrect details, and answer questions relating to the original event. Typically, subjects in the misled experimental group report more false details than those from the control group. The main purpose of the presented study was to compare two methods of reducing the misinformation effect, namely - warning against misinformation and reinforced self-affirmation. The reinforced self-affirmation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark