Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Voting Secrecy and the Right to Justification.Pierre-Etienne Vandamme - 2018 - Constellations 25 (3):388-405.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Objectivity of Beliefs, Reasonable Disagreement and Political Deliberation.Felipe Oliveira De Sousa - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (2):262-281.
    This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political authority. It aims to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. The argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation, that figures as a stage of political decisionā€making. It has to do with a confrontation between incompatible substantive beliefs which, however, all seem to be reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in an enterprise (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Judicial Review.W. J. Waluchow - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):258–266.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Authority, Equality and Democracy.Andrei Marmor - 2005 - Ratio Juris 18 (3):315-345.
    . The purpose of this essay is to argue that considerations of fairness play an essential role in the justification of democratic decision procedures. The first part argues that considerations of fairness form part of a practical authority's legitimacy, and that in the political context, those considerations of fairness entail a principle of equal distribution of political power. Subsequently, the article elaborates on the kind of equality which is required in democratic procedures, arguing that different principles of equality should apply (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The Objectivity of Beliefs, Reasonable Disagreement and Political Deliberation.Felipe Oliveira De Sousa - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (2):262-281.
    This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political authority. It aims to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. The argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation, that figures as a stage of political decision-making. It has to do with a confrontation between incompatible substantive beliefs which, however, all seem to be reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in an enterprise (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What is Democratic Reliability? Epistemic Theories of Democracy and the Problem of Reasonable Disagreement.Felix Gerlsbeck - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):218-241.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations