Switch to: References

Citations of:

Cosmopolis

Theory, Culture and Society 19 (1-2):1-16 (2002)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Cosmopolitanized Nations: Re-imagining Collectivity in World Risk Society.Ulrich Beck & Daniel Levy - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (2):3-31.
    The concept of the national is often perceived, both in public and academic discourse as the central obstacle for the realization of cosmopolitan orientations. Consequently, debates about the nation tend to revolve around its persistence or its demise. We depart from this either-or perspective by investigating the formation of the ‘cosmopolitan nation’ as a facet of world risk society. Modern collectivities are increasingly preoccupied with debating, preventing and managing risks. However, unlike earlier manifestations of risk characterized by daring actions or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Ubiquitous Media.Mike Featherstone - 2009 - Theory, Culture and Society 26 (2-3):1-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Reading the earth charter: Cosmopolitan environmental citizenship or light green politics as usual?Sherilyn MacGregor - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1):85 – 96.
    This paper offers two possible readings of the Earth Charter that are informed by current scholarship in the field of environmental politics. The first reading finds much in the document to suggest congruence with emerging discourses of cosmopolitanism and global environmental citizenship. The second reading, a more sceptical one, identifies aspects of the Earth Charter that seem more resonant with depoliticizing United Nations-style light green globalism than with an inclusive ethical vision of environmentalism. After setting out these two readings, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Locating Cosmopolitanism.Z. Skrbis - 2004 - Theory, Culture and Society 21 (6):115-136.
    The emerging interdisciplinary body of cosmopolitanism research has established a promising field of theoretical endeavour by bringing into focus questions concerning globalization, nationalism, population movements, cultural values and identity. Yet, despite its potential importance, what characterizes recent cosmopolitanism research is an idealist sentiment that considerably marginalizes the significance of the structures of nation-state and citizenship, while leaving unspecified the empirical sociological dimensions of cosmopolitanism itself. Our critique aims at making cosmopolitanism a more productive analytical tool. We argue for a cosmopolitanism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations