- Arguments from Unacceptable Consequences and a Reasonable Application of Law.Eveline T. Feteris - unknowndetails
|
|
Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):61-79.details
|
|
Exploring the virtues of zero tolerance arguments.Sheldon Wein - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on: Sheldon Wein's "Exploring the virtues of zero tolerance arguments".Marcin Lewiński - unknowndetails
|
|
Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):20-30.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a convincing argument?Hans Hoeken, Rian Timmers & Peter Jan Schellens - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):394 - 416.details
|
|
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.details
|
|
Choosing variants of pragmatic argumentation in anticipation of countermoves in health brochures.Lotte van Poppel & Linda Carozza - unknowndetails
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering with the Intention of the Legislator in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):335-353.details
|
|
Defeasibility, Law, and Argumentation: A Critical View from an Interpretative Standpoint.Francesca Poggi - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):409-434.details
|
|
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification.Eveline Feteris - unknowndetails
|
|
I. Fairclough and N. Fairclough, Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students.Assimakis Tseronis - 2013 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (2):269-278.details
|
|
Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople's criteria to distinguish strong arguments from weak ones.Hans Hoeken, Ester Šorm & Peter Jan Schellens - 2014 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (1):77-98.details
|
|
Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns.Bin Wang & Frank Zenker - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (4):581-601.details
|
|
The Analysis and Evaluation of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory.Eveline Feteris & Harm Klossterhuis - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).details
|
|
Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.details
|
|
Strategic Manoeuvring with Linguistic Arguments in the Justification of Legal Decisions.Eveline Feteris - unknowndetails
|
|
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.details
|
|