Switch to: References

Citations of:

Standards for evaluation of ethics consultation

In John C. Fletcher, Norman Quist & Albert R. Jonsen (eds.), Ethics consultation in health care. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Health Administration Press. pp. 171--184 (1989)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Were the “Pioneer” Clinical Ethics Consultants “Outsiders”? For Them, Was “Critical Distance” That Critical?Bruce D. White, Wayne N. Shelton & Cassandra J. Rivais - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (6):34-44.
    “Clinical ethics consultants” have been practicing in the United States for about 50 years. Most of the earliest consultants—the “pioneers”—were “outsiders” when they first appeared at patients' bedsides and in the clinic. However, if they were outsiders initially, they acclimated to the clinical setting and became “insiders” very quickly. Moreover, there was some tension between traditional academics and those doing applied ethics about whether there was sufficient “critical distance” for appropriate reflection about the complex medical ethics dilemmas of the day (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Ethik-Konsultationsdienst nach dem Konzept von J.C. Fletcher an der University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA : Ein Praxisbericht aus dem Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg.Burkhard Gerdes & Gerd Richter - 1999 - Ethik in der Medizin 11 (4):249-261.
    Definition of the problem: In Germany, clinical ethics is still in the state of development. Ethics consultation is very new and rare in the clinical setting in German university hospitals. Therefore this paper describes the clinical ethics activities at the Medical Center of Philipps University, Marburg, regard to ethics consultation in a case report. Clinical ethics rounds at the Surgical Intensive Care Unit are organized according to the theory and practice of the ethics consultation service at the Medical Center of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Of goals and goods and floundering about: A dissensus report on clinical ethics consultation.Jeffrey P. Bishop, Joseph B. Fanning & Mark J. Bliton - 2009 - HEC Forum 21 (3):275-291.
    Of Goals and Goods and Floundering About: A Dissensus Report on Clinical Ethics Consultation Content Type Journal Article Pages 275-291 DOI 10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1 Authors Jeffrey P. Bishop, Vanderbilt University Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 400 Nashville Tennessee 37203 USA Joseph B. Fanning, Vanderbilt University Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 400 Nashville Tennessee 37203 USA Mark J. Bliton, Vanderbilt University Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society 2525 West End Avenue, Suite (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Prolegomena to Any Future Code of Ethics for Bioethicists.Michael Yeo - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):403.
    A major facet of the bioethics phenomenon in North America has been the emergence of a new profession on the healthcare turf: a growing number of people calling themselves or being called “bioethicists.” Bioethicists are plying their trade mainly as ethics consultants in hospital settings and as researchers and educators with university affiliations. Other more questionable affiliations can easily be imagined: Bioethicist for a controversial transplant program? For a lobby or advocacy group? For a pharmaceutical company?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Can Complex Legislation Solve Our End-of-Life Problems?Brendan Minogue & James E. Reagan - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):115.
    Over a 20-year period, the United States has developed a consensus of legal opinion concerning living wills and other advance directives. At the heart of this consensus are two interconnected principles. First, the state should minimally interfere with the wishes of patients and surrogates and the decisions of physicians about foregoing life-sustaining treatments. Second, state interference is permissible for the sake of protecting a compelling state interest. The overwhelming majority of states with advance directive laws have attained this balance of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations