Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Biconsequences.Szymon Frankowski - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):353-364.
    p-consequence (plausible consequence; see [2]) allows for a formulation of non-deductive reasonings, i.e., such where the conclusion has weaker justification then assumptions and thus when added to the set of assumptions results in its extension. But theoretical modesty of p-consequence operation does not tell the difference between “good” and “worse” conclusions. Therefore the bisconsequence is introduced.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Valuations: Bi, Tri, and Tetra.Rohan French & David Ripley - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (6):1313-1346.
    This paper considers some issues to do with valuational presentations of consequence relations, and the Galois connections between spaces of valuations and spaces of consequence relations. Some of what we present is known, and some even well-known; but much is new. The aim is a systematic overview of a range of results applicable to nonreflexive and nontransitive logics, as well as more familiar logics. We conclude by considering some connectives suggested by this approach.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Syntactic Properties of P-Consequence.Szymon Frankowski - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (4):285-295.
    p-consequence is intended as a formalization of non-deductive reasoning. So far semantical or general properties have been presented more thoroughly ([2]–[5]). In the present paper we would like to focus on its syntactic properties.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation