Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dogmatischer Dogmatismusvorwurf: Eine Replik Auf Stefan Müller-Doohm Und Roman Yos.Fabian Freyenhagen - 2019 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67 (1):42-58.
    Does theorising always presuppose a programme of justification? Does the Critical Theory of Adorno and Horkheimer do so? Do they claim it does? The answer should be a resounding ‘no’ to all three questions. In regard to the second and third question, I have sketched an argument to that effect in an earlier paper in this journal. In this paper, I offer a rejoinder to the critical reply offered by Stefan Müller-Doohm und Roman Yos on behalf of the Habermasian mainstream (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aesthetic Freedom and Democratic Ethical Life: A Hegelian Account of the Relationship Between Aesthetics and Democratic Politics.Jörg Schaub - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):75-97.
    This paper presents a novel Hegelian view of the relationship between aesthetics and democratic politics. My account avoids the drawbacks associated with approaches that reconceive all of the political in aesthetic terms or reduce the aesthetic to art. Instead, I maintain that the aesthetic is best understood as a distinct relationship of individual freedom. My argument proceeds by highlighting shortcomings of Honneth’s account of democratic Sittlichkeit and then addressing these impasses by integrating aesthetic freedom into the picture. The first two (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Social Freedom as Ideology.Karen Ng - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
    This article explores objections made against ideal theorizing in political philosophy by two prominent contemporary critical theorists: Axel Honneth and Charles Mills. In Freedom’s Right, Honneth...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Between Normativism and Naturalism: Honneth on Social Pathology.Arvi Särkelä & Arto Laitinen - 2019 - Constellations 26 (2):286-300.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Utopian Shadow of Normative Reconstruction.M. T. C. Shafer - 2018 - Constellations 25 (3):406-420.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Christopher F. Zurn, Axel Honneth. Cambridge: Polity, 2015, 257 Pp., £55 , ISBN 978‐0‐7456‐4903‐0. [REVIEW]Timo Jütten - 2017 - Dialectica 71 (1):146-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions: Normative Reconstruction as Method of Critical Theory.Jörg Schaub - 2015 - Critical Horizons 16 (2):107-130.
    In this article I argue that the method of normative reconstruction that is underlying Freedom’s Right undermines Critical Theory’s aspiration to be a force that is unreservedly critical and progressive. I start out by giving a brief account of the four premises of the method of normative reconstruction and unpack their implications for how Honneth conceptualizes social pathologies and misdevelopments, specifically that these notions are no longer linked to radical critique and normative revolution. In the second part, I demonstrate that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • A Practice–Theoretical Account of Privacy.Wulf Loh - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (4):233-247.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Recognition, Disrecognition and Legitimacy.Luiz Gustavo da Cunha de Souza - 2016 - Thesis Eleven 134 (1):13-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two Ways of Being a Left-Heideggerian.Kurt C. M. Mertel - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (9):966-984.
    This article is concerned with the question of the relative priority between political and social ontology within left-Heideggerianism, a tradition recently reconstructed by Oliver Marchart. Although the title seems to imply that this question is an open and live one within left-Heideggerianism – that the two paths at the crossroads have been clearly delineated when, in fact, the current predicament of left-Heideggerianism resembles more a one-way street – this is somewhat misleading: the identification of left-Heideggerianism with a post-foundationalist political ontology (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark