Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Typology and Natural Kinds in Evo-Devo.Ingo Brigandt - 2021 - In Nuño De La Rosa Laura & Müller Gerd (eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide. Springer. pp. 483-493.
    The traditional practice of establishing morphological types and investigating morphological organization has found new support from evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo), especially with respect to the notion of body plans. Despite recurring claims that typology is at odds with evolutionary thinking, evo-devo offers mechanistic explanations of the evolutionary origin, transformation, and evolvability of morphological organization. In parallel, philosophers have developed non-essentialist conceptions of natural kinds that permit kinds to exhibit variation and undergo change. This not only facilitates a construal of species (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Pattern Without Process: Eugen Smirnov and the Earliest Project of Numerical Taxonomy (1923–1938).Maxim V. Vinarski - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (3):559-583.
    The progress towards mathematization or, in a broader context, towards an increased “objectivity” is one of the main trends in the development of biological systematics in the past century. It is commonplace to start the history of numerical taxonomy with the works of R. R. Sokal and P. H. A. Sneath that in the 1960s laid the foundations of this school of taxonomy. In this article, I discuss the earliest research program in this field, developed in the 1920s by the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Die Aktualität Lyssenkos.Johann-Peter Regelmann - 1981 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12 (2):353-363.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nikolai Vavilov in the years of Stalin's ‘Revolution from Above’.Eduard I. Kolchinsky - 2014 - Centaurus 56 (4):330-358.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Case of Paul Kammerer: Evolution and Experimentation in the Early 20th Century. [REVIEW]Sander Gliboff - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (3):525 - 563.
    To some, a misguided Lamarckian and a fraud, to others a martyr in the fight against Darwinism, the Viennese zoologist Paul Kammerer (1880-1926) remains one of the most controversial scientists of the early 20th century. Here his work is reconsidered in light of turn-of-the-century problems in evolutionary theory and experimental methodology, as seen from Kammerer's perspective in Vienna. Kammerer emerges not as an opponent of Darwinism, but as one would-be modernizer of the 19th-century theory, which had included a role for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations