Switch to: References

Citations of:

Intuitions: the theories of Kant and Bolzano

R. George

In Mark Siebel & Mark Textor (eds.), Semantik Und Ontologie: Beiträge Zur Philosophischen Forschung. Frankfurt: Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 319--53 (2004)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence.Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.details In a series of publications beginning in the 1980s, John Etchemendy has argued that the standard semantical account of logical consequence, due in its essentials to Alfred Tarski, is fundamentally mistaken. He argues that, while Tarski's definition requires us to classify the terms of a language as logical or non-logical, no such division is guaranteed to deliver the correct extension of our pre-theoretical or intuitive consequence relation. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, Tarski's account is claimed to be incapable of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 9 citations
Remarks on Bolzano's Conception of Necessary Truth.Paul Rusnock - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):1-21.details This essay presents a new interpretation of Bolzano's account of necessary truth as set out in ?182 of the Theory of Science. According to this interpretation, Bolzano's conception is closely related to that of Leibniz, with some important differences. In the first place, Bolzano's conception of necessary truth embraces not only what Leibniz called metaphysical or brute necessities but also moral necessities (truths grounded in God's choice of the best among all metaphysical possibilities). Second, in marked contrast to Leibniz, Bolzano (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 4 citations

1