Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A-not-B Errors: Testing the Limits of Natural Pedagogy Theory.Marion Vorms - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):525-545.
    Gergely and Csibra's theory, known as "natural pedagogy theory", is meant to explain how infants fast-learn generic knowledge from adults. In this paper, my goal is to assess the explanatory import of this theory in a particular case, namely the phenomena known as "A-not-B errors". I first propose a clarification of natural pedagogy theory's fundamental hypotheses. Then, I describe Topál et al.'s (Science, 321, 1831-1834, 2008) experiments, which consist in applying natural pedagogy theory's framework to the A-not-B errors. Finally, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Goal attribution in chimpanzees.Claudia Uller & Shaun Nichols - 2000 - Cognition 76 (2):B27-B34.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Pulling out the intentional structure of action: the relation between action processing and action production in infancy.Jessica A. Sommerville & Amanda L. Woodward - 2005 - Cognition 95 (1):1-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • One‐year‐old infants use teleological representations of actions productively.Michael Ramscar, Daniel Yarlett, Shimon Edelman, Nathan Intrator, Gergely Csibra, Szilvia Bıró, Orsolya Koós, György Gergely, Holk Cruse & Michael D. Lee - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (1):111-133.
    Two experiments investigated whether infants represent goal‐directed actions of others in a way that allows them to draw inferences to unobserved states of affairs (such as unseen goal states or occluded obstacles). We measured looking times to assess violation of infants' expectations upon perceiving either a change in the actions of computer‐animated figures or in the context of such actions. The first experiment tested whether infants would attribute a goal to an action that they had not seen completed. The second (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change.John E. Opfer - 2002 - Cognition 86 (2):97-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Children’s understanding of the costs and rewards underlying rational action.Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Laura E. Schulz - 2015 - Cognition 140 (C):14-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants.Gergely Csibra - 2008 - Cognition 107 (2):705-717.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy.Gergely Csibra, György Gergely, Szilvia Bı́ró, Orsolya Koós & Margaret Brockbank - 1999 - Cognition 72 (3):237-267.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • One‐year‐old infants use teleological representations of actions productively.Gergely Csibra, Szilvia Bíró, Orsolya Koós & György Gergely - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (1):111-133.
    Two experiments investigated whether infants represent goal‐directed actions of others in a way that allows them to draw inferences to unobserved states of affairs (such as unseen goal states or occluded obstacles). We measured looking times to assess violation of infants' expectations upon perceiving either a change in the actions of computer‐animated figures or in the context of such actions. The first experiment tested whether infants would attribute a goal to an action that they had not seen completed. The second (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction.Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
    Theories of children's developing understanding of mind tend to emphasize either individualistic processes of theory formation, maturation, or introspection, or the process of enculturation. However, such theories must be able to account for the accumulating evidence of the role of social interaction in the development of social understanding. We propose an alternative account, according to which the development of children's social understanding occurs within triadic interaction involving the child's experience of the world as well as communicative interaction with others about (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • Action understanding as inverse planning.Chris L. Baker, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Cognition 113 (3):329-349.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations