Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Literary Wittgenstein

Philosophy 81 (316):367-375 (2006)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What Philosophy can and cannot do for Education.Paul Smeyers - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (1):1-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Una cierta idea de la filosofía:acerca de la recepción y no recepción de Nicolás Gómez Dávila en Francia.Michäel Rabier - 2019 - Revista Filosofía Uis 18 (1):189-206.
    la recepción de la obra de Nicolás Gómez Dávila en Francia ha sido muy escasa hasta el momento, sobre todo en el medio universitario. Este problema de la no recepción –más que de la recepción– está ligado no solamente y directamente a una cuestión editorial y/o de traducción, sino a un asunto intelectual y académico que tiene, según nuestra tesis, mucho que ver con la concepción francesa y moderna de la filosofía y a lo que hemos llamado la “anti-filosofía” gomezdaviliana.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The case for fiction as qualitative research: towards a non-referential ground for meaning.Stijn Mus - 2012 - Ethics and Education 7 (2):137-148.
    In the wake of the crisis of representation, the qualitative approaches have gained momentum within the social sciences. This crisis has lead to a widespread awareness about the need to incorporate the subject's understanding in the research design. Yet, the validity of qualitative accounts is still regarded as a function of its representative accuracy. This, and not its meaningfulness, remains the qualifying property to judge its value. I argue that this can only be overcome by a retreat from realist ontology. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Encomium of the Ordinary: Remarks on Hosseini’s Wittgenstein.Dylan B. Futter - 2016 - Philosophical Papers 45 (1-2):317-333.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nonsense and the Ineffable: Re-reading the Ethical Standpoint in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Géza Kállay - 2012 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 1 (1):103-130.
    The paper examines the ethical standpoint of the Tractatus as it has been reconstructed by Cora Diamond (“the austere view”) and gives an account of some of the criticism this reconstruction has received in the work of P. M. S. Hacker and Meredith Williams (“the standard view”). The second half of the paper tries to argue that the austere and the standard views rather complement each other if we recognize “two I ’-s” in the Tractatus and if it is supposed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation