Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Minimizing harm via psychological intervention: Response to Glannon.Joshua Shepherd - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):662-663.
    In a recent discussion, Walter Glannon discusses a number of ways we might try to minimize harm to patients who experience intraoperative awareness. In this response I direct attention to a possibility that deserves further attention. It might be that a kind of psychological intervention – namely, informing patients of the possibility of intraoperative awareness and of what to expect in such a case – would constitute a unique way to respect patient autonomy, as well as minimize the harm that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The harm of intraoperative awareness.Neil Levy - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):660-661.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Intraoperative awareness: consciousness, memory and law.Walter Glannon - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):663-664.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The limited right to alter memory.Adam J. Kolber - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):658-659.
    We like to think we own our memories: if technology someday enables us to alter our memories, we should have certain rights to do so. But our freedom of memory has limits. Some memories are simply too valuable to society to allow individuals the unfettered right to change them. Suppose a patient regains consciousness in the middle of surgery. While traumatized by the experience and incapable of speaking, he coincidentally overhears two surgeons make plans to set fire to the hospital. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Fiddling with memory.Andrew Davidson - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):659-660.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation