Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Harm to Others. [REVIEW]Martin P. Golding - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):295-298.
    This first volume in the four-volume series The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law focuses on the "harm principle," the commonsense view that prevention of harm to persons other than the perpetrator is a legitimate purpose of criminal legislation. Feinberg presents a detailed analysis of the concept and definition of harm and applies it to a host of practical and theoretical issues, showing how the harm principle must be interpreted if it is to be a plausible guide to the lawmaker.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • (2 other versions)On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
    Consciousness is a mongrel concept: there are a number of very different "consciousnesses." Phenomenal consciousness is experience; the phenomenally conscious aspect of a state is what it is like to be in that state. The mark of access-consciousness, by contrast, is availability for use in reasoning and rationally guiding speech and action. These concepts are often partly or totally conflated, with bad results. This target article uses as an example a form of reasoning about a function of "consciousness" based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1178 citations  
  • The Philosophical Implications of Awareness during General Anesthesia, In Consciousness, Awareness, and Anesthesia (edited by George Mashour).Eric LaRock - 2010 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by George Mashour.
    Consciousness, Awareness, and Anesthesia is a multidisciplinary approach to both the scientific problem of consciousness and the clinical problem of awareness during general anesthesia.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Propranolol and the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder: Is it wrong to erase the “sting” of bad memories?Michael Henry, Jennifer R. Fishman & Stuart J. Youngner - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):12 – 20.
    The National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, MD) reports that approximately 5.2 million Americans experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) each year. PTSD can be severely debilitating and diminish quality of life for patients and those who care for them. Studies have indicated that propranolol, a beta-blocker, reduces consolidation of emotional memory. When administered immediately after a psychic trauma, it is efficacious as a prophylactic for PTSD. Use of such memory-altering drugs raises important ethical concerns, including some futuristic dystopias put forth (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • Where in the brain is pain? : evaluating painful experiences in non-communicative patients.Athena Demertzi & Steven Laureys - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Memory-altering drugs: Shifting the paradigm of informed consent.Evelyn M. Tenenbaum & Brian Reese - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):40 – 42.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations