Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Experimental Approaches to Moral Standing.Geoffrey P. Goodwin - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):914-926.
    Moral patients deserve moral consideration and concern – they have moral standing. What factors drive attributions of moral standing? Understanding these factors is important because it indicates how broadly individuals conceptualize the moral world, and suggests how they will treat various entities, both human and non-human. This understanding has recently been advanced by a series of studies conducted by both psychologists and philosophers, which have revealed three main drivers of moral standing: the capacity to suffer, intelligence or autonomy, and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • What is (and was) a person? Evidence on historical mind perceptions from natural language.Elliott Ash, Dominik Stammbach & Kevin Tobia - 2023 - Cognition 239 (C):105501.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Problems of Empirically-Informed Arguments for and against Retributivism.Valerij Zisman & Paul Rehren - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-27.
    In recent years, a number of philosophers and social scientists have argued in favor of or against retributive theories of criminal punishment based on empirical findings about folk punitive judgment and decision-making. In this paper, we will argue that these arguments do not succeed. We will raise two objections. First, there are serious gaps between the empirical findings these authors cite and the descriptive premises these findings are meant to support. Second, in many cases, the existing research does not support (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures.Neele Engelmann & Michael R. Waldmann - 2022 - Cognition 218 (C):104910.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness.Nathan A. Dhaliwal, Daniel P. Skarlicki, JoAndrea Hoegg & Michael A. Daniels - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 176 (3):451-466.
    Upholding cooperative norms via punishment is of central importance in organizations. But what effect does punishing have on the reputation of the punisher? Although previous research shows third parties can garner reputational benefits for punishing transgressors who violate social norms, we proposed that such reputational benefits can vary based on the perceived motive for the punishment. In Studies 1 and 2, we found that individuals who endorsed a consequentialist (versus deontological) motive for punishing were seen as more trustworthy. In Study (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing.Jared Piazza, Justin F. Landy & Geoffrey P. Goodwin - 2014 - Cognition 131 (1):108-124.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Do Companies Think and Feel? Mind Perception of Organizations.Simone Tang & Kurt Gray - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (8):e13320.
    How do people perceive the minds of organizations? Existing work on organizational mind perception highlights two key debates: whether organizational groups are ascribed more agency than experience, and whether people are really perceiving minds in organizational groups at all. Our current paper and its data weigh in on these debates and suggest that organizations can indeed be ascribed experiential minds. We present a “member and goals” framework for systematically understanding the mind perception of organization. This framework suggests that people can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark