Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A parametrized ranking-based semantics compatible with persuasion principles.Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny & Nicolas Maudet - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (1):49-85.
    In this work, we question the ability of existing ranking-based semantics to capture persuasion settings, emphasising in particular the phenomena of procatalepsis and of fading. Some widely accepted principles of ranking-based semantics are incompatible with a faithful treatment of these phenomena, which means that no existing ranking-based semantics can capture these two principles together. This motivates us to introduce a new parametrized ranking-based semantics based on the notion of propagation which extends the existing propagation semantics 139–150) by adding an additional (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation.Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny & Nicolas Maudet - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3-4):328-386.
    1. Argumentation consists in reasoning with conflicting information based on the exchange and evaluation of interacting arguments. It can be used for modelling dialogue (persuasion, negotiation), d...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation.Lixing Tan, Zhaohui Zhu & Jinjin Zhang - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 315 (C):103836.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Argumentation schemes for clinical decision support.Isabel Sassoon, Nadin Kökciyan, Sanjay Modgil & Simon Parsons - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):329-355.
    This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help clinicians in making treatment decisions. The work builds on the use of computational argumentation, a rigorous approach to reasoning with complex data that places strong emphasis on being able to justify and explain the decisions that are recommended. The main contribution of the paper is to present a novel set of specialised argumentation schemes that can be used in the context of a clinical decision support (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations