Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Kant's Criticism of Common Moral Rational Cognition.Martin Sticker - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):85-108.
    There is a consensus that Kant's aim in the Groundwork is to clarify, systematize and vindicate the common conception of morality. Philosophical theory hence serves a restorative function. It can strengthen agents' motivation, protect against self-deception and correct misunderstandings produced by uncritical moral theory. In this paper, I argue that Kant also corrects the common perspective and that Kant's Groundwork shows in which senses the common perspective, even considered apart from its propensity to self-deception and without being influenced by misleading (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique.David James - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (3):390-392.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pyrrhonism Vs. Academic Skepticism in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.Catalina González - 2011 - Philosophy Today 55 (Supplement):225-230.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Scepticism, Kantian Criticism.Robert Stern - 2006 - Kantian Review 11:102-116.
    In this article, I want to argue that scepticism for Kant must be seen in ancient and not just modern terms, and that if we take this into account we will need to take a different view of Kant's response to Hume from the one that is standardly presented in the literature. This standard view has been put forward recently by Paul Guyer, and it is therefore his view that I want to look at in some detail, and to try (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Moral-Psychology of the Common Agent – A Reply to Ido Geiger.Martin Sticker - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (5):976-989.
    Ido Geiger's paper ‘What it is the Use of the Universal Law Formula of the Categorical Imperative?’ is part of a growing trend in Kant scholarship, which stresses the significance of the rational competence of ordinary human beings. I argue that this approach needs to take into account that the common agent is an active reasoner who has the means to find out what she ought to do. The purpose of my paper is to show how universality already figures in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic.Brian A. Chance - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):311-331.
    Kant's response to scepticism in the Critique of Pure Reason is complex and remarkably nuanced, although it is rarely recognized as such. In this paper, I argue that recent attempts to flesh out the details of this response by Paul Guyer and Michael Forster do not go far enough. Although they are right to draw a distinction between Humean and Pyrrhonian scepticism and locate Kant's response to the latter in the Transcendental Dialectic, their accounts fail to capture two important aspects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Kant-Bibliographie 2003.Margit Ruffing - 2005 - Kant-Studien 96 (4):468-501.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Can Common Rational Capacities Confirm the Correctness of the Deduction in Groundwork III—and Why Does It Matter?Martin Sticker - 2014 - Hegel Bulletin 35 (2):228-251.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations