Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Neuraths enzyklopädismus: Entwurf eines radikalen Empirizismus.Thomas Mormann - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):73 - 100.
    In this paper I want to show that a main theme of Neurath’s philosophical work was the formulation of a radically empiricist theory of science. His approach, dubbed "encyclopedism", can be characterized by the following five theses: scientific knowledge is (1) fallible, (2) pluralistic, (3) holistic, (4) can be systematized only locally, and (5) does not give us a faithful description of the real world. (4) is to be considered as the most original thesis of encyclopedism and is discussed in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Rudolf Haller.Friedrich Stadler - 2022 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (2):204-222.
    Rudolf Haller was one of the pioneers of “Austrian philosophy” and analytic philosophy dealing with Bolzano, Brentano, Meinong, and Mach up to Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, especially Schlick and Neurath. As professor at the University of Graz he fostered this field with his teaching and research and promoted it together with a lot of invited renowned foreign scholars. In addition, he created the influential Grazer Forschungs- und Dokumentationsstelle für Österreichische Philosophie which hosts important philosophical archives. Moreover, he co-founded the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Hidden Agendas: Knowledge and Verification.Joia Lewis - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):159-168.
    Schlick has been accused of a number of philosophical sins over the years, most notably his rather casual, and frequent, traversing of the borders between language, experience, and reality. While we allow our scientists the freedom to roam creatively throughout the peripheral regions of Epistemology and Metaphysics, we are not so tolerant of our philosophers. We know that Schlick gave up the physics laboratory for the philosopher’s armchair, and we expect him to stick to a particular position.Schlick’s colleagues in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark