Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Prioritized and Non-prioritized Multiple Change on Belief Bases.Marcelo A. Falappa, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Maurício D. L. Reis & Guillermo R. Simari - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):77-113.
    In this article we explore multiple change operators, i.e., operators in which the epistemic input is a set of sentences instead of a single sentence. We propose two types of change: prioritized change, in which the input set is fully accepted, and symmetric change, where both the epistemic state and the epistemic input are equally treated. In both kinds of operators we propose a set of postulates and we present different constructions: kernel changes and partial meet changes.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference.Marcelo Alejandro Falappa, Alejandro Javier García, Gabriele Kern-Isberner & Guillermo Ricardo Simari - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):161-193.
    We propose a revision operator on a stratified belief base, i.e., a belief base that stores beliefs in different strata corresponding to the value an agent assigns to these beliefs. Furthermore, the operator will be defined as to perform the revision in such a way that information is never lost upon revision but stored in a stratum or layer containing information perceived as having a lower value. In this manner, if the revision of one layer leads to the rejection of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Similarity semantics and minimal changes of belief.Sven Ove Hansson - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):401-429.
    Different similarity relations on sets are introduced, and their logical properties are investigated. Close relationships are shown to hold between similarity relations that are based on symmetrical difference and operators of belief contraction that are based on relational selection functions. Two new rationality criteria for minimal belief contraction, the maximizing property and the reducing property, are proposed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Theory contraction and base contraction unified.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):602-625.
    One way to construct a contraction operator for a theory (belief set) is to assign to it a base (belief base) and an operator of partial meet contraction for that base. Axiomatic characterizations are given of the theory contractions that are generated in this way by (various types of) partial meet base contractions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • (1 other version)Local change.Sven Ove Hansson & Renata Wassermann - 2002 - Studia Logica 70 (1):49 - 76.
    An agent can usually hold a very large number of beliefs. However, only a small part of these beliefs is used at a time. Efficient operations for belief change should affect the beliefs of the agent locally, that is, the changes should be performed only in the relevant part of the belief state. In this paper we define a local consequence operator that only considers the relevant part of a belief base. This operator is used to define local versions of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • What's new isn't always best.Sven Ove Hansson - 1997 - Theoria 63 (1-2):1-13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Knowledge-level analysis of belief base operations.Sven Ove Hansson - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence 82 (1-2):215-235.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Inductive logic is the study of belief allocation.Daniel Osherson - manuscript
    links to current studies in the theory of scientific discovery. Our own theory is elaborated in four papers accessible in pdf format through the links on the left.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How not to change the theory of theory change: A reply to Tennant.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):361-380.
    A number of seminal papers on the logic of belief change by Alchourrön, Gärden-fors, and Makinson have given rise to what is now known as the AGM paradigm. The present discussion note is a response to Neil Tennant's [1994], which aims at a critical appraisal of the AGM approach and the introduction of an alternative approach. We show that important parts of Tennants's critical remarks are based on misunderstandings or on lack of information. In the course of doing this, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations