Switch to: References

Citations of:

Hegel's Concept of God

Philosophical Books 24 (3):153-157 (1983)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Thomas Reid on Causation and Scientific Explanation.Manuel Barrantes & Juan Manuel Durán - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (1):51-67.
    We argue that there is no tension between Reid's description of science and his claim that science is based on the principles of common sense. For Reid, science is rooted in common sense since it is based on the idea that fixed laws govern nature. This, however, does not contradict his view that the scientific notions of causation and explanation are fundamentally different from their common sense counterparts. After discussing these points, we dispute with Cobb's and Benbaji's interpretations of Reid's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Thomas Reid Today.Esther Engels Kroeker - 2015 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 13 (2):95-114.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)The philosophy of Thomas Reid editorial introduction.John Haldane - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):433-436.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Editorial Introduction.John Haldane - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):433-436.
    I survey some important semantical and axiomatic theories of self-referential truth. Kripke's fixed-point theory, the revision theory of truth and appraoches involving fuzzy logic are the main examples of semantical theories. I look at axiomatic theories devised by Cantini, Feferman, Freidman and Sheard. Finally some applications of the theory of self-referential truth are considered.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Thomas Reid's Rigourised Anti-Hypotheticalism.Shannon Dea - 2005 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):123-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Was Moore a Moorean? On Moore and Scepticism.Peter Baumann - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):181-200.
    One of the most important views in the recent discussion of epistemological scepticism is Neo-Mooreanism. It turns a well-known kind of sceptical argument (the dreaming argument and its different versions) on its head by starting with ordinary knowledge claims and concluding that we know that we are not in a sceptical scenario. This paper argues that George Edward Moore was not a Moorean in this sense. Moore replied to other forms of scepticism than those mostly discussed nowadays. His own anti-sceptical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations