Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Your liberty or your life: Reciprocity in the use of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. [REVIEW]A. M. Viens, Cécile M. Bensimon & Ross E. G. Upshur - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):207-217.
    In this paper, we explore the role of reciprocity in the employment of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Reciprocity should be understood as a substantive value that governs the use, level and extent of restrictive measures. We also argue that independent of the role reciprocity plays in the legitimisation the use of restrictive measures, reciprocity can also motivate support and compliance with legitimate restrictive measures. The importance of reciprocity has implications for how restrictive measures should be undertaken when preparing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • What’s the difference between health care ethics, medical ethics and nursing ethics?David Seedhouse - 1997 - Health Care Analysis 5 (4):267-274.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The bioethics tabloids: How professional ethicists have fallen for the myth of tertiary transmitted heterosexual AIDS. [REVIEW]Udo Schüklenk, David Mertz & Juliet Richters - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (1):27-36.
    The hysteria and misconceptions about AIDS which are fostered and held by the popular press have been accepted uncritically by many bioethicists, who have not bothered to explore popular empirical claims in sufficient depth. As a result, and because ethicists attempt tosell moral problems in a manner not much different from the way the popular press attempt tosell newspapers, artificial dilemmas have been produced in professional journals. We concentrate on just one popular misconception about AIDS-that the hetersexual incidence of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Modified mandated choice for organ procurement.P. Chouhan - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):157-162.
    Presumed consent to organ donation looks increasingly unlikely to be a palatable option for increasing organ procurement in the UK following the publication of the report into events at Alder Hey and elsewhere. Yet, given that the alternative to increasing the number of cadaveric organs available is either to accept a greater number of live donations, or accept that people will continue to die for the want of an organ, public policy makers remain obliged to consider other means of increasing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Should persons detained during public health crises receive compensation?Søren Holm - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):197-205.
    One of the ways in which public health officials control outbreaks of epidemic disease is by attempting to control the situations in which the infectious agent can spread. This may include isolation of infected persons, quarantine of persons who may be infected and detention of persons who are present in or have entered premises where infected persons are being treated. Most who have analysed such measures think that the restrictions in liberty they entail and the detriments in welfare they impose (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Moral Standards.John Harris, Soren Holm, Udo Schüklenk, David Mertz & Juliet Richters - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (3):270-272.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The right to know and the right to privacy: confidentiality, HIV and health care professionals.D. Dickenson - 1994 - Nursing Ethics 1 (2):111-115.
    This article uses a case study to examine the conflicting rights of the patient to know a clinician;s HIV status and the clinician's right to privacy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bioethics: History, Scope, Object.A. F. Cascais - 1997 - Global Bioethics 10 (1-4):9-24.
    A comprehensive analysis of the evolving conditions that provided for the emergence and autonomization of the field of bioethical inquiry, as well as the social, cultural and political background against which its birth can be set, should enlighten us about the problematic nature that characterises it from its very onset. Those conditions are: abuses in experimentation on human subjects, availability of new biomedical technologies, the challenging of prevalent medical paradigms and the ultimate meaning and purpose of medical care, new scientific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation