Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Speech acts.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Speech acts are a staple of everyday communicative life, but only became a topic of sustained investigation, at least in the English-speaking world, in the middle of the Twentieth Century.[1] Since that time “speech act theory” has been influential not only within philosophy, but also in linguistics, psychology, legal theory, artificial intelligence, literary theory and many other scholarly disciplines.[2] Recognition of the importance of speech acts has illuminated the ability of language to do other things than describe reality. In the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • The Inferential Significance of Frege’s Assertion Sign.Mitchell S. Green - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (2):201-229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Illocutionary force and semantic content.Mitchell S. Green - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (5):435-473.
    Illocutionary force and semantic content are widely held to occupy utterly different categories in at least two ways: Any expression serving as an indicator of illocutionary force must be without semantic content, and no such expression can embed. A refined account of the force/content distinction is offered here that does the explanatory work that the standard distinction does, while, in accounting for the behavior of a range of parenthetical expressions, shows neither nor to be compulsory. The refined account also motivates (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • What should we teach about questions?David Harrah - 1982 - Synthese 51 (1):21 - 38.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation