Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ‘Exploding’ immaterial substances: Margaret Cavendish’s vitalist-materialist critique of spirits.Emma Wilkins - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (5):858-877.
    ABSTRACTIn this paper, I explore Margaret Cavendish’s engagement with mid-seventeenth-century debates on spirits and spiritual activity in the world, especially the problems of incorporeal substance and magnetism. I argue that between 1664 and 1668, Cavendish developed an increasingly robust form of materialism in response to the deficiencies which she identified in alternative philosophical systems – principally mechanical philosophy and vitalism. This was an intriguing direction of travel, given the intensification in attacks on the supposedly atheistic materialism of Hobbes. While some (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Francesco Patrizi’s two books on space: geometry, mathematics, and dialectic beyond Aristotelian science.Amos Edelheit - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):243-257.
    Francesco Patrizi was a competent Greek scholar, a mathematician, and a Neoplatonic thinker, well known for his sharp critique of Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. In this article I shall present, in the first part, the importance of the concept of a three-dimensional space which is regarded as a body, as opposed to the Aristotelian two-dimensional space or interval, in Patrizi’s discussion of physical space. This point, I shall argue, is an essential part of Patrizi’s overall critique of Aristotelian science, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The philosophical systems of Francesco Patrizi and Henry More.Jacques Joseph - 2019 - Intellectual History Review 29 (4):595-617.
    This paper presents a comparison of the philosophical systems of Francesco Patrizi and Henry More. The point, however, is not to demonstrate Patrizi’s influence on More but rather to see how, with respect to some particular subjects, they both tried to offer a modern interpretation of Neoplatonism. The main axis of the analysis follows the topics of space, light, and soul. While to More, light is of merely marginal interest, it is demonstrated that space and soul are of crucial importance (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Essay Review: Henry More and Newton's Gravity, Henry More: Magic, Religion and Experiment.John Henry - 1993 - History of Science 31 (1):83-97.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Francesco Patrizi’s concept of “nature”: presence and refutation of Stoicism.Thomas Leinkauf - 2019 - Intellectual History Review 29 (4):575-593.
    This essay analyzes the ways in which, in his Nova de Universis Philosophia, Francesco Patrizi uses, adopts, and, in some cases, rejects the Stoic philosophical tradition. Although, at first glance, most of Patrizi’s remarks on Stoicism and Stoic understanding of nature are critical – as this article demonstrates – he widely relied on Stoic teaching that he sought to combine with Neoplatonism and the prisca theologia doctrine.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A note on Francesco Patrizi's use of Cleomedes.Robert B. Todd - 1982 - Annals of Science 39 (3):311-314.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Francesco patrizi.Fred Purnell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation