Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. More on the Preservation of Large Cardinals Under Class Forcing.Joan Bagaria & Alejandro Poveda - 2023 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 88 (1):290-323.
    We prove two general results about the preservation of extendible and $C^{(n)}$ -extendible cardinals under a wide class of forcing iterations (Theorems 5.4 and 7.5). As applications we give new proofs of the preservation of Vopěnka’s Principle and $C^{(n)}$ -extendible cardinals under Jensen’s iteration for forcing the GCH [17], previously obtained in [8, 27], respectively. We prove that $C^{(n)}$ -extendible cardinals are preserved by forcing with standard Easton-support iterations for any possible $\Delta _2$ -definable behaviour of the power-set function on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Indestructibility properties of Ramsey and Ramsey-like cardinals.Victoria Gitman & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (6):103106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An axiomatic approach to forcing in a general setting.Rodrigo A. Freire & Peter Holy - 2022 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 28 (3):427-450.
    The technique of forcing is almost ubiquitous in set theory, and it seems to be based on technicalities like the concepts of genericity, forcing names and their evaluations, and on the recursively defined forcing predicates, the definition of which is particularly intricate for the basic case of atomic first order formulas. In his [3], the first author has provided an axiomatic framework for set forcing over models of $\mathrm {ZFC}$ that is a collection of guiding principles for extensions over which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Varieties of Class-Theoretic Potentialism.Neil Barton & Kameryn J. Williams - 2024 - Review of Symbolic Logic 17 (1):272-304.
    We explain and explore class-theoretic potentialism—the view that one can always individuate more classes over a set-theoretic universe. We examine some motivations for class-theoretic potentialism, before proving some results concerning the relevant potentialist systems (in particular exhibiting failures of the $\mathsf {.2}$ and $\mathsf {.3}$ axioms). We then discuss the significance of these results for the different kinds of class-theoretic potentialists.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Indeterminateness and `The' Universe of Sets: Multiversism, Potentialism, and Pluralism.Neil Barton - 2021 - In Melvin Fitting (ed.), Research Trends in Contemporary Logic (Series: Landscapes in Logic). College Publications. pp. 105-182.
    In this article, I survey some philosophical attitudes to talk concerning `the' universe of sets. I separate out four different strands of the debate, namely: (i) Universism, (ii) Multiversism, (iii) Potentialism, and (iv) Pluralism. I discuss standard arguments and counterarguments concerning the positions and some of the natural mathematical programmes that are suggested by the various views.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Set-theoretic blockchains.Miha E. Habič, Joel David Hamkins, Lukas Daniel Klausner, Jonathan Verner & Kameryn J. Williams - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):965-997.
    Given a countable model of set theory, we study the structure of its generic multiverse, the collection of its forcing extensions and ground models, ordered by inclusion. Mostowski showed that any finite poset embeds into the generic multiverse while preserving the nonexistence of upper bounds. We obtain several improvements of his result, using what we call the blockchain construction to build generic objects with varying degrees of mutual genericity. The method accommodates certain infinite posets, and we can realize these embeddings (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Forcing and the Universe of Sets: Must We Lose Insight?Neil Barton - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (4):575-612.
    A central area of current philosophical debate in the foundations of mathematics concerns whether or not there is a single, maximal, universe of set theory. Universists maintain that there is such a universe, while Multiversists argue that there are many universes, no one of which is ontologically privileged. Often forcing constructions that add subsets to models are cited as evidence in favour of the latter. This paper informs this debate by analysing ways the Universist might interpret this discourse that seems (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Absoluteness via resurrection.Giorgio Audrito & Matteo Viale - 2017 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 17 (2):1750005.
    The resurrection axioms are forcing axioms introduced recently by Hamkins and Johnstone, developing on ideas of Chalons and Veličković. We introduce a stronger form of resurrection axioms for a class of forcings Γ and a given ordinal α), and show that RAω implies generic absoluteness for the first-order theory of Hγ+ with respect to forcings in Γ preserving the axiom, where γ = γΓ is a cardinal which depends on Γ. We also prove that the consistency strength of these axioms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Hyperclass forcing in Morse-Kelley class theory.Carolin Antos & Sy-David Friedman - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (2):549-575.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Characterizations of pretameness and the Ord-cc.Peter Holy, Regula Krapf & Philipp Schlicht - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (8):775-802.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations