Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Pragmatism and East-Asian Thought.Richard Shusterman - 2004 - Metaphilosophy 35 (1-2):13-43.
    After noting some conditions of historical and contemporary context that favor a dialogue between pragmatism and East‐Asian thought, which could help generate a new international philosophical perspective, this essay focuses on several themes that pragmatism shares with classical Chinese philosophy. Among the interrelated themes explored are the primacy of practice, the emphasis on pluralism, context, and flux, a recognition of fallibilism, an appreciation of the powers of art for individual, social, and political reconstruction, the pursuit of perfectionist self‐cultivation in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The God of Abraham, Isaac, and (william) James.David W. Paulsen - 1999 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13 (2):114-146.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Pragmatism, Realism and Hermeneutics.Andrea Fiore - 2022 - Critical Hermeneutics 6 (2).
    This paper aims to analyse the notion of familiarity in Dewey’s pragmatism in order to show its important role as a tool for human beings to interpret the reality, manage it, and act within it. Starting from an examination of Deweyan transactional realism, the discourse focuses on familiarity and its related terms (such as “familiar,” “to familiarize,” but also opposites such as “unknown” or “strange”) in Dewey’s thought, to finally come to highlight its fundamental hermeneutic role. This might be useful (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why James Can be an Existential Pluralist: A Response to Talisse and Aikin.J. Edward Hackett - 2017 - Contemporary Pragmatism 14 (4):506-527.
    In this paper, I would like to revisit the revisiting of Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin’s response to Joshua Anderson. My work here will not render judgment about how they respond to Anderson, but instead, my thinking is that the response to the restatement of their argument is the most current iteration of “Why Pragmatists Cannot Be Pluralists.” In this way, I am responding to their most updated version of their argument and the substantial issues raised in the original paper. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark