- Mathematical Representation and Explanation: structuralism, the similarity account, and the hotchpotch picture.Ziren Yang - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Leedsdetails
|
|
The Jesuits and the Method of Indivisibles.David Sherry - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (2):367-392.details
|
|
Continuity in Logic of Sense: Deleuze, Leibniz, Dedekind.Hamed Movahedi - forthcoming - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology.details
|
|
Leibniz on the requisites of an exact arithmetical quadrature.Federico Raffo Quintana - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67 (C):65-73.details
|
|
Method, Demonstration and Invention: Leibniz and the Treatment of Quadrature Problems.Federico Raffo Quintana - 2022 - Ideas Y Valores 71 (180):97-116.details
|
|
Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals II: their existence, their use and their role in the justification of the differential calculus.David Rabouin & Richard T. W. Arthur - 2020 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 74 (5):401-443.details
|
|
A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8).Ohad Nachtomy - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.details
|
|
What Does God Know but can’t Say? Leibniz on Infinity, Fictitious Infinitesimals and a Possible Solution of the Labyrinth of Freedom.Elad Lison - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (1):261-288.details
|
|
The mathematical form of measurement and the argument for Proposition I in Newton’s Principia.Katherine Dunlop - 2012 - Synthese 186 (1):191-229.details
|
|
Interpreting the Infinitesimal Mathematics of Leibniz and Euler.Jacques Bair, Piotr Błaszczyk, Robert Ely, Valérie Henry, Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz, Semen S. Kutateladze, Thomas McGaffey, Patrick Reeder, David M. Schaps, David Sherry & Steven Shnider - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (2):195-238.details
|
|
Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals.Richard T. W. Arthur - 2013 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 67 (5):553-593.details
|
|