Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bringing older people’s perspectives on consumer socially assistive robots into debates about the future of privacy protection and AI governance.Andrea Slane & Isabel Pedersen - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-20.
    A growing number of consumer technology companies are aiming to convince older people that humanoid robots make helpful tools to support aging-in-place. As hybrid devices, socially assistive robots (SARs) are situated between health monitoring tools, familiar digital assistants, security aids, and more advanced AI-powered devices. Consequently, they implicate older people’s privacy in complex ways. Such devices are marketed to perform functions common to smart speakers (e.g., Amazon Echo) and smart home platforms (e.g., Google Home), while other functions are more specific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Liminality: The Not-So-New Normal?Michael A. Ashby - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):1-5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Can an AI-carebot be filial? Reflections from Confucian ethics.Kathryn Muyskens, Yonghui Ma & Michael Dunn - forthcoming - Nursing Ethics.
    This article discusses the application of artificially intelligent robots within eldercare and explores a series of ethical considerations, including the challenges that AI (Artificial Intelligence) technology poses to traditional Chinese Confucian filial piety. From the perspective of Confucian ethics, the paper argues that robots cannot adequately fulfill duties of care. Due to their detachment from personal relationships and interactions, the “emotions” of AI robots are merely performative reactions in different situations, rather than actual emotional abilities. No matter how “humanized” robots (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark