Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Are You Sure You Want to View This Community? Exploring the Ethics of Reddit’s Quarantine Practice.Caitlin Ring Carlson & Luc S. Cousineau - 2020 - Journal of Media Ethics 35 (4):202-213.
    In the United States, social media organizations are not legally liable for what users do or say on their platforms and are free to regulate expression in any way they see fit. As a result, dark co...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Pragmatist Media Ethics and the Challenges of Fake News.Scott R. Stroud - 2019 - Journal of Media Ethics 34 (4):178-192.
    ABSTRACTIncreasing attention is being directed at the impact of fake news on democratic societies across the globe. Scholars in a range of fields are attempting to determine who is behind fake news...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Design Factors of Ethics and Responsibility in Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature and Expert Review of Guiding Principles.Kate Sangwon Lee & Huaxin Wei - 2022 - Journal of Media Ethics 37 (3):156-178.
    Large-scale social media services have been challenged due to their lack of ethical principles, which has resulted in allegations of user manipulation such as propagation of fake news related to COVID-19 vaccination and biased algorithmic curations that lead to social polarization. We studied current social media community guidelines and conducted a systematic literature review to identify the core values needed for the establishment of guidelines for responsible social media services. Through expert interviews, a framework and guidelines are proposed for each (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Digital Promotion of Suicide: A Platform-Level Ethical Analysis.Raphael Cohen-Almagor & Sam Lehman-Wilzig - 2022 - Journal of Media Ethics 37 (2):108-127.
    This article utilizes Aristotelian and Kantian philosophies to probe the social responsibilities of internet intermediaries that in one way or another assist and promote suicide. Striking a balance...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s behavioral microtargeting.Ken Ward - 2018 - Journal of Media Ethics 33 (3):133-148.
    ABSTRACTThe 2016 US presidential election witnessed the development of ethically dubious methods of political persuasion built and executed on social networking sites. The following analyzes the ethics of behavioral microtargeting practices such as those of Cambridge Analytica, a company that claims to have played a central role in Donald Trump’s successful candidacy through its use of social networking sites such as Facebook. After describing Cambridge Analytica’s method of data manipulation and identifying several threats to individual autonomy posed by such practices, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Electoral Reckonings: Press Criticism of Presidential Campaign Coverage, 2000-2016.Elizabeth Bent, Kimberly Kelling & Ryan J. Thomas - 2020 - Journal of Media Ethics 35 (2):96-111.
    The cyclical nature of presidential elections provides regular opportunities for journalists to reflect on patterns in election coverage. This study presents a textual analysis of press criticism o...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Review of The Mueller Report. [REVIEW]Jooho Lee - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 163 (1):167-172.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Social Media Ethics and the Politics of Information.Jennifer Forestal & Abraham Singer - 2020 - Business Ethics Journal Review 8 (6):31-37.
    Johnson conceptualizes the social responsibilities of digital media platforms by describing two ethical approaches: one emphasizing the discursive freedom of platform-users, the other emphasizing protecting users from harmful posts. These competing concerns are on full display in the current debate over platforms’ obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic. While Johnson argues both approaches are grounded in democracy, we argue that democratic commitments transcend the freedom/harm dichotomy. Instead, a commitment to democracy points toward social media companies’ responsibilities to structure their platforms in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark