Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The analytic-synthetic distinction and the classical model of science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege.Willem R. de Jong - 2010 - Synthese 174 (2):237-261.
    This paper concentrates on some aspects of the history of the analytic-synthetic distinction from Kant to Bolzano and Frege. This history evinces considerable continuity but also some important discontinuities. The analytic-synthetic distinction has to be seen in the first place in relation to a science, i.e. an ordered system of cognition. Looking especially to the place and role of logic it will be argued that Kant, Bolzano and Frege each developed the analytic-synthetic distinction within the same conception of scientific rationality, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Bibliografía internacional sobre la metafísica y la filosofía de la religión de Kant desde 1900.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Endoxa 1 (18):529.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mendelssohn and Kant on Mathematics and Metaphysics.John J. Callanan - 2014 - Kant Yearbook 6 (1):1-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A puzzle about incongruent counterparts and the critique of pure reason.Rogério Passos Severo - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):507–521.
    Kant uses incongruent counterparts in his work before and after 1781, but not in the first Critique. Given the relevance that incongruent counterparts had for his thought on space, and their persistence in his work during the 1780s, it is plausible to think that he had a reason for leaving them out of both editions of the Critique. Two implausible conjectures for their absence are here considered and rejected. A more plausible alternative is put forth, which explains that textual absence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation