Switch to: References

Citations of:

Animal Models for Psychiatry

Behaviorism 16 (2):175-179 (1988)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What's the stimulus?G. E. Zuriff - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):664-664.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The assessment of intentionality in animals.Thomas R. Zentall - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):663-663.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cats on the Couch: The Experimental Production of Animal Neurosis.Alison Winter - 2016 - Science in Context 29 (1):77-105.
    ArgumentIn the 1940s–50s, one of the most central questions in psychological research related to the nature of neurosis. In the final years of the Second World War and the following decade, neurosis became one of the most prominent psychiatric disorders, afflicting a high proportion of military casualties and veterans. The condition became central to the concerns of several psychological fields, from psychoanalysis to Pavlovian psychology. This paper reconstructs the efforts of Chicago psychiatrist Jules Masserman to study neurosis in the laboratory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Animal models: Nature made us, but was the mold broken?David Lubinski & Travis Thompson - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):664-680.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • We can reliably report psychological states because they are neither internal nor private.James D. Laird - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):654-654.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pigeons as communicators and thinkers: Mon oncle d'Amerique deux?Robert W. Mitchell - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):655-656.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Communication and internal states: What is their relationship?Michael Bamberg - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):643-644.
    Common folks “have” emotions and talk to others; and sometimes they make “their” emotions the topic of such talk. The emotions seem to be “theirs,” since they can be conceived of as private states ; and they can be topicalized, because we seem to be able to attribute or lend a conventionalized public form to some inner state or event. This is the way much of our folk-talk and folk-thinking about emotions, the expression thereof, the role of language in these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Are some mental states public events?Nicholas S. Thompson - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):662-663.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cross-fertilization between research on interpersonal communication and drug discrimination.I. P. Stolerman - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):661-662.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How do we know when private events control behavior?Kurt Salzinger - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):660-661.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Animal models of human communication.S. Plous - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):660-660.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Communicative acts and drug-induced feelings.Irene M. Pepperberg - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):659-660.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Private states and animal communication.Chris Mortensen - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):658-659.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The role of convention in the communication of private events.Chris Moore - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):656-657.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Behaviorism, introspection and the mind's I.Jay Moore - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):657-658.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Species and individual differences in communication based on private states.David Lubinski & Travis Thompson - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):627-642.
    The way people come to report private stimulation arising within their own bodies is not well understood. Although the Darwinian assumption of biological continuity has been the basis of extensive animal modeling for many human biological and behavioral phenomena, few have attempted to model human communication based on private stimulation. This target article discusses such an animal model using concepts and methods derived from the study of discriminative stimulus effects of drugs and recent research on interanimal communication. We discuss how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • What's biological about the continuity?Justin Leiber - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):654-655.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Animal modeling in psychopharmacological contexts.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):653-654.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Pigeons and the problem of other minds.Aarre Laakso - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):652-653.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Behaviorism is alive and well.Lloyd G. Humphreys - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):651-652.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Difference without discontinuity.Max Hocutt - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):651-651.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A promissory note is paid, but has this bought into an illusion?Philip N. Hineline - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):650-651.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Communication versus discrimination.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):649-650.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A human model for animal behavior.Richard Garrett - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):648-649.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • No report; no feeling.Lawrence H. Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):647-648.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Plausible reconstruction? No!E. J. Capaldi & Robert W. Proctor - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):646-647.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Animal communication of private states does not illuminate the human case.Selmer Bringsjord & Elizabeth Bringsjord - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):645-646.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The outside route to the inside story.Marc N. Branch - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):644-645.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The status of private events in behavior analysis.William M. Baum - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):644-644.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Perhaps Sisyphus is the relevant model for animal-language researchers.Donald M. Baer - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):642-643.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Making Organisms Model Human Behavior: Situated Models in North-American Alcohol Research, since 1950.Rachel A. Ankeny, Sabina Leonelli, Nicole C. Nelson & Edmund Ramsden - 2014 - Science in Context 27 (3):485-509.
    ArgumentWe examine the criteria used to validate the use of nonhuman organisms in North-American alcohol addiction research from the 1950s to the present day. We argue that this field, where the similarities between behaviors in humans and non-humans are particularly difficult to assess, has addressed questions of model validity by transforming the situatedness of non-human organisms into an experimental tool. We demonstrate that model validity does not hinge on the standardization of one type of organism in isolation, as often the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations