Switch to: References

Citations of:

Defeat and proficiencies

Philosophical Issues 32 (1):82-103 (2022)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Unpossessed evidence revisited: our options are limited.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (11):3017-3035.
    Several influential thought experiments from Harman 1973 purport to show that unpossessed evidence can undermine knowledge. Recently, some epistemologists have appealed to these thought experiments in defense of a logically stronger thesis: unpossessed evidence can defeat justification. But these appeals fail to appreciate that Harman himself thought of his examples as Gettier cases, and so would have rejected this strengthening of his thesis. On the contrary, he would have held that while unpossessed evidence can undermine knowledge, it leaves justification intact. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Testimonial liberalism and the balance of epistemic goals.Ross F. Patrizio - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (11):2997-3015.
    There are two broad views in the epistemology of testimony, conservatism and liberalism. The two views disagree over a particular necessary condition on testimonial justification: the positive reasons requirement (PRR). Perhaps the most prominent objection levelled at liberalism from the conservative camp stems from gullibility; without PRR, the thought goes, an objectionable form of gullibility looms large for liberals. In this paper I aim to make two main contributions: to introduce a new metric for adjudicating this debate; and to argue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark