Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Governance Challenges of Corporate Political Activity.Nicolas M. Dahan, Michael Hadani & Douglas A. Schuler - 2013 - Business and Society 52 (3):365-387.
    This article explains the rationale for study of the governance challenges of corporate political activity. The topic is important, especially in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, but understudied to date. The authors review the literature bearing on this topic. The authors separate consideration of the topic into macro-level and micro-level issues. The macro level concerns the societal perspective. At this level, key research questions concern whether corporate political activity be allowed, and how it should be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Ignorance as a starting point: From modest epistemology to realistic political theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):1-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Family Matters.Michael Hadani - 2007 - Business and Society 46 (4):395-428.
    This study explores the impact of publicly traded founding family firms (FFFs) on their propensity for corporate political activity (CPA) and their choice of political approaches. Based on the behavior and characteristics of publicly traded FFFs, the author expected a positive association between FFFs and corporate political activity and a preference for relational, or long-term, over transactional, or short-term, corporate political activity. It was found that publicly traded FFFs are more likely to engage in CPA only when the firm's founder (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The leaning tower of “pisa”: Public ignorance, issue publics, and state autonomy: Reply to DeCanio.Daniel Carpenter - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):157-164.
    ABSTRACT In the pages of this journal, Samuel DeCanio and colleagues have advanced the proposition that public ignorance (PI) can lead to state autonomy (SA), inasmuch as the public cannot constrain state actions of which it is unaware. The pisa framework, while original and deserving of further research, needs to take account of complicating factors on both the public ignorance and the state autonomy sides of the equation. ?Knowledge,? and thus ?ignorance,? is a matter of diverse interpretations, so what seems (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation