- Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory.Jocelyn Penny Small - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):208-208.details
|
|
Beyond the correspondence metaphor: When accuracy cannot be assessed.Ian R. Newby & Michael Ross - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):205-206.details
|
|
Operationaling “correspondence”.David C. Palmer - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):206-207.details
|
|
Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy.Lia Kvavilashvili & Judi Ellis - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):199-200.details
|
|
The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong, or useful?Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):211-228.details
|
|
False dichotomies and dead metaphors.Timothy P. McNamara - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):203-203.details
|
|
Remembering as doing.Ulric Neisser - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):203-204.details
|
|
Amnesia and metamemory demonstrate the importance of both metaphors.Bennett L. Schwartz - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):207-207.details
|
|
Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research.Daniel B. Wright - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):210-211.details
|
|
The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology of animal learning and memory.Howard Eichenbaum - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):196-197.details
|
|
Driving and dish-washing: Failure of the correspondence metaphor for memory.Keith S. Karn & Gregory J. Zelinsky - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):198-198.details
|
|
Correspondence to the past: The essence of the archaeology metaphor.Steen F. Larsen - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):200-201.details
|
|
The alternative to the storehouse metaphor.Aaron Ben-Ze'ev - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):192-193.details
|
|
On correspondence, accuracy, and truth.Ian Maynard Begg - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):191-192.details
|
|
The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive or descriptive?Darryl Bruce - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):194-195.details
|
|
What do memories correspond to?Martin A. Conway - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):195-196.details
|
|
Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find.Daniel Algom - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):188-189.details
|
|
Everyday memory and activity.Richard Alterman - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):189-190.details
|
|
Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory.Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):167-188.details
|
|
Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory.Ronald P. Fisher - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):197-197.details
|
|
The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils.Arie W. Kruglanski - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):198-199.details
|
|
The phenomenal object of memory and control processes.Giuliana Mazzoni - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):202-203.details
|
|
Functional memory requires a quite different value metaphor.Norman H. Anderson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):190-191.details
|
|
Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor.K. Geoffrey White - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):208-209.details
|
|
Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics.Robert A. Bjork & Thomas D. Wickens - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):193-194.details
|
|
The effects of constrained rehearsal on judgments of temporal order.Bryan C. Auday, Christopher Sullivan & Henry A. Cross - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):548-551.details
|
|
Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory.Thomas O. Nelson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):204-205.details
|
|
Contexts and functions of retrieval.Eugene Winograd - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):209-210.details
|
|
Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition.Andrew R. Mayes, Rob van Eijk & Patricia L. Gooding - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):201-202.details
|
|
The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content.Harry P. Bahrick - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):191-191.details
|
|
Object recognition as a function of stimulus characteristics.William A. Barnard, Marshall Breeding & Henry A. Cross - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (1):15-18.details
|
|