Switch to: References

Citations of:

The ethics of biodefense

Bioethics 19 (4):432–446 (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues.Nicholas G. Evans - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283.
    Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Science and Science Policy: Regulating “Select Agents” in the Age of Synthetic Biology.Pierre-Olivier Méthot - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (3):280-309.
    Just like atomic physics seventy years ago, when it was realized that chain reaction could lead to medical applications as well as to the creation of atomic weapons, the life sciences have entered a grey zone. “Advances in biotechnology […]” a 2003 CIA document stated, “have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare threat […] Engineered biological agents could be much worse than any disease known to man”. As sociologists of science have noted, contemporary life sciences have (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The dual-use problem, scientific isolationism and the division of moral labour.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):86-105.
    The dual-use problem is an ethical quandary sometimes faced by scientists and others in a position to influence the creation or dissemination of scientific knowledge. It arises when an agent is considering whether to pursue some project likely to result in the creation or dissemination of scientific knowledge, that knowledge could be used in both morally desirable and morally undesirable ways, and the risk of undesirable use is sufficiently high that it is not clear that the agent may permissibly pursue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Strange bedfellows? Reflections on bioethics' role in disaster response planning.Jessica Berg & Nicholas King - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):3 – 5.
    This essay considers the potential role of bioethics in disaster response planning and preparedness. Bioethicists can make substantial contributions, by ensuring that decision-making and distribution of resources during crises is carried out in a fair and just manner, as well as by examining the assumptions upon which disaster planning are based. Bioethicists should also be aware of potential pitfalls of overly-hasty engagement with this new field.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation