Switch to: Citations

References in:

The ethics of biodefense

Bioethics 19 (4):432–446 (2005)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Dealing with Humpty Dumpty: Research, Practice, and the Ethics of Public Health Surveillance.Amy L. Fairchild - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):615-623.
    Alice considered [the idea of un-birthday presents] a little. “I llke birthday presents best,” she said at last.“You don’t know what you’re talking about!” cried Humpty Dumpty. … “[There are three hundred and sixty-four days when you might get un-birthday presents… And only one for birthday presents, you know. There’s a ‘glory’ for you!”“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said.Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Public Health in an Era of Terrorism: The IOM Report on Public-Health Infrastructure. Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. [REVIEW]Thomas May - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):10 – 14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Bioethics after the Terror.Jonathan D. Moreno - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):60-64.
    Bioethics as a field has been fortunate that its values and concerns have mirrored the values and concerns of society. In light of the September 11th attacks, it is possible that we are witnessing the beginning of a transition in American culture, one fraught with implications for bioethics. The emphasis on autonomy and individual rights may come to be tempered by greater concern over the collective good. Increased emphasis on solidarity over autonomy could greatly alter public response to research abuses (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Should Smallpox Vaccine be Made Available to the General Public?Thomas May & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):67-82.
    : In June 2002, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved draft recommendations concerning preparation for potential biological terror attacks that utilize the smallpox virus. ACIP recommends against both mandatory and voluntary vaccination of the general public. The present paper examines the moral and political considerations both for and against each of the general public vaccination options considered by the ACIP in the context of the state's authority over vaccination for the purposes of protecting public health. Although it is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Smallpox Vaccination of Health Care Workers: Professional Obligations and Defense against Bioterrorism.Thomas May, Mark P. Aulisio & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (5):26-33.
    Health care workers have not gone along with President Bush's request that they be vaccinated against smallpox in order to prepare the nation's health care system for a terrorist attack using the virus. But there is no professional moral obligation to receive the vaccination—either as a matter of public health or as a matter of national security.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations