Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The puzzles of ground.Adam Lovett - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2541-2564.
    I outline and provide a solution to some paradoxes of ground.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Grounding Rules and (Hyper-)Isomorphic Formulas.Francesca Poggiolesi - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Logic 17 (1):70.
    An oft-defended claim of a close relationship between Gentzen inference rules and the meaning of the connectives they introduce and eliminate has given rise to a whole domain called proof-theoretic semantics, see Schroeder- Heister ; Prawitz. A branch of proof-theoretic semantics, mainly developed by Dosen ; Dosen and Petric, isolates in a precise mathematical manner formulas that have the same meaning. These isomorphic formulas are defined to be those that behave identically in inferences. The aim of this paper is to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Axiomatic Theories of Partial Ground II: Partial Ground and Hierarchies of Typed Truth.Johannes Korbmacher - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (2):193-226.
    This is part two of a two-part paper in which we develop an axiomatic theory of the relation of partial ground. The main novelty of the paper is the of use of a binary ground predicate rather than an operator to formalize ground. In this part of the paper, we extend the base theory of the first part of the paper with hierarchically typed truth-predicates and principles about the interaction of partial ground and truth. We show that our theory is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Could the Grounds’s Grounding the Grounded Ground the Grounded?Jon Erling Litland - 2018 - Analysis 78 (1):56-65.
    Could φ’s partially grounding ψ itself be a partial ground for ψ? I show that it follows from commonly accepted principles in the logic of ground that this sometimes happens. It also follows from commonly accepted principles that this never happens. I show that this inconsistency turns on different principles than the puzzles of ground already discussed in the literature, and I propose a way of resolving the inconsistency.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Grounding Principles for Implication.Francesca Poggiolesi - forthcoming - Synthese:1-26.
    Most of the logics of grounding that have so far been proposed contain grounding axioms, or grounding rules, for the connectives of conjunction, disjunction and negation, but little attention has been dedicated to the implication connective. The present paper aims at repairing this situation by proposing adequate grounding principles for relevant implication. Because of the interaction between negation and implication, new grounding principles concerning negation will also arise.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Defense of the Disunity of Grounding.Jon Erling Litland - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):97-108.
    Fine (2012) is a pluralist about grounding. He holds that there are three fundamentally distinct notions of grounding: metaphysical, normative, and natural. Berker (2017) argues for monism on the grounds that the pluralist cannot account for certain principles describing how the distinct notions of grounding interact. This paper defends pluralism. By building on work by Fine (2010) and Litland (2015) I show how the pluralist can systematically account for Berker's interaction principles.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations