Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Complexity of the Concept of Literary Autonomy.Nino Tevdoradze - 2021 - Theoria 87 (6):1380-1396.
    This paper is an attempt to analyse the concept of literary autonomy, to explore its various manifestations in previous and current theories of literary studies and literary aesthetics, and to fit it into a broad outlook of literature's specificity and uniqueness. It defends the idea of literature's separate identity, however, not at the expense of breaking free of the concept of meaning in the strict sense, seeking special literary value in the independence of aesthetic value from other values, or in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Structure Disclosed. Replete Moments and Aesthetic Experience in Reading Novels.Kalle Puolakka - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (4):544-561.
    ABSTRACTDespite the huge interest in different philosophical questions surrounding literature, particularly analytic philosophers have had relatively little to say about literature’s specifically a...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aesthetic Properties, the Acquaintance Principle, and the Problem of Nonperceptual Arts.Filippo Focosi - 2019 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 53 (1):61-77.
    The search for a definition of art has been at the forefront of the debate in the analytical philosophical tradition for at least the last fifty years. If for nearly twenty years the dominant accounts were those offered by proponents of a relational account of art, be it in the form of an institutional or of an intentional/historical theory, by the middle 1980s, aesthetic theories of art started to reappear. What binds together the definitions elaborated by such diverse authors as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Literary Fictions as Utterances and Artworks.Jukka Mikkonen - 2010 - Theoria 76 (1):68-90.
    During the last decades, there has been a debate on the question whether literary works are utterances, or have utterance meaning, and whether it is reasonable to approach them as such. Proponents of the utterance model in literary interpretation, whom I will refer to as “utterance theorists”, such as Noël Carroll and especially Robert Stecker, suggest that because of their nature as linguistic products of intentional human action, literary works are utterances similar to those used in everyday discourse. Conversely, those (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation