Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey.Leah Pierson, Sophie Gibert, Leila Orszag, Haley K. Sullivan, Rachel Yuexin Fei, Govind Persad & Emily A. Largent - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (9).
    Bioethicists influence practices and policies in medicine, science, and public health. However, little is known about bioethicists’ views. We recently surveyed 824 U.S. bioethicists on a wide range of ethical issues, including topics related to abortion, medical aid in dying, and resource allocation, among others. We also asked bioethicists about their demographic, religious, academic, and professional backgrounds. We find that bioethicists’ normative commitments predict their views on bioethical issues. We also find that, in important ways, bioethicists’ views do not align (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of bioethics education through quality standards and indicators.Ercan Avci - 2021 - International Journal of Ethics Education 7 (1):5-19.
    Bioethics education has remarkably grown across the globe in the last few decades. The data of the UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory proves that bioethics education is a global phenomenon with various bioethics institutions, teaching programs, and academicians. However, this situation does not mean that bioethics education has reached a stable and flawless level. Especially, the effectiveness of bioethics programs or their quality assessment is a major area that should be analyzed through more academic works. For filling that gap, this article (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Need for “Big Bioethics” Research.Richard R. Sharp & Joel E. Pacyna - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1):3-5.
    Empirical bioethics research has become an established field of study, with its own unique goals, vocabulary, and methods, and wi...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics.Lisa M. Lee - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (9):5-12.
    Contemporary biomedical ethics and environmental ethics share a common ancestry in Aldo Leopold's and Van Rensselaer Potter's initial broad visions of a connected biosphere. Over the past five decades, the two fields have become strangers. Public health ethics, a new subfield of bioethics, emerged from the belly of contemporary biomedical ethics and has evolved over the past 25 years. It has moved from its traditional concern with the tension between individual autonomy and community health to a wider focus on social (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • For Bioethics to Center Justice, We Must Reconsider Funding, Training, and the Taxonomy of Bioethics.Lisa M. Lee - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):26-28.
    In their article “The Bioethics of Environmental Injustice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Implications of Unhealthy Environments,” Ray and Cooper (2024) invite us to prioritize environmental health...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What Does “Bioethics” Mean? Education, Training, and Shaping the Future of Our Field.Brian Tuohy, Lisa M. Lee, Nicolle Strand, Shaden Eldakar-Hein & Elyse Gadra - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (9):35-38.
    In “Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey,” Pierson et al. (2024) provide a valuable snapshot of the normative commitments and demographic backgrounds of 824 U.S. bioethicist...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Developing a competency framework for health research ethics education and training.Sean Tackett, Jeremy Sugarman, Chirk Jenn Ng, Adeeba Kamarulzaman & Joseph Ali - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):391-396.
    Health research ethics training programmes are being developed and implemented globally, often with a goal of increasing local capacity to assure ethical conduct in health-related research. Yet what it means for there to be sufficient HRE capacity is not well-defined, and there is currently no consensus on outcomes that HRE training programmes should collectively intend to achieve. Without defining the expected outcomes, meaningful evaluation of individual participants and programmes is challenging. In this article, we briefly describe the evolution of formal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark