Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Time and Change in Chinese Buddhist Philosophy: From Sengzhao to Chan Buddhism.JeeLoo Liu - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (6):e12915.
    The philosophy of time and change in Chinese Buddhism originated in a short treatise written by an early Chinese monk, Sengzhao (c. 384-414 CE). In this treatise, “On the Immutability of Things (wubuqianlun),” Sengzhao proposed a revolutionary theory of time and change that opposed the traditional Chinese notion of change established by Confucianism and Daoism. His thesis of the immutability of things also seemingly defies a fundamental Buddhist teaching about the impermanence of things. More than a thousand years after Sengzhao, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anthropological search for value orientations of a new culture by Aurelius Augustine.V. V. Kuzmenko, V. O. Boniak & I. A. Serdiuk - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 16:157-170.
    Purpose. The article is aimed to reveal the essence of the eternal problem, comprehended by Augustine Aurelius in the culture of the early Middle Ages – the focus of the value orientations of the anthropological search. Theoretical basis. Only in the twentieth century, various aspects of Augustine’s creative legacy became the subject of scientific research by many authors. As the direction of their scientific research, the problem of the relationship of reason, faith, knowledge, which has risen sharply in medieval Christian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Seng Zhao’s The Immutability of Things and Responses to It in the Late Ming Dynasty.Christoph Anderl, Yu Liu & Bart Dessein - 2020 - Religions 11 (12).
    Seng Zhao and his collection of treatises, the Zhao lun, have enjoyed a particularly high reputation in the history of Chinese Buddhism. One of these treatises, The Immutability of Things, employs the Madhyamaka argumentative method of negating dualistic concepts to demonstrate that, while "immutability" and "mutability" coexist as the states of phenomenal things, neither possesses independent self-nature. More than a thousand years after this text was written, Zhencheng's intense criticism of it provoked fierce reactions among a host of renowned scholar-monks. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations