Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Violence of the Benevolent Ruler: Classical Confucianism and Punitive Expedition.Sungmoon Kim - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (2):e12902.
    In the past two decades, scholars in China and beyond have vigorously demonstrated that the just war discourse is integral to classical Confucianism and that the classical Confucian idea of “punitive expedition” can be best understood in terms of humanitarian intervention. The sceptics, however, claim that in describing the ancient sage‐king's bloodless punitive expeditions, what classical Confucians really had in mind was not so much to endorse morally justified forms of aggressive war but to highlight the paramount importance of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reason and Moral Motivation in Mòzǐ.Myeong-Seok Kim - 2021 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20 (2):179-205.
    Based on the observation that ancient Chinese thinkers formulated their conception of logic and agency mainly around the concept of biàn 辯 (discrimination), Chris Fraser argues that (1) ancient Chinese thinkers had no concept of sentence or proposition, (2) they did not engage in logical argumentation in its proper sense, and (3) reason or rationality was not highly valued in ancient China for normative evaluation of actions. However, the text of the Mòzǐ 墨子 contains strong pieces of evidence against these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Making peace with the barbarians: Neo-Confucianism and the pro-peace argument in 17th-century Korea.Sungmoon Kim - 2023 - European Journal of Political Theory 22 (1):117-140.
    This article investigates the Neo-Confucian discourse on war, premised on the “Chinese versus barbarian” binary, and its impact on the Neo-Confucian scholar-officials of 17th-century Chosŏn Korea. It shows that Korean Neo-Confucians suffered invasions from the Jurchens, who they regarded as “barbarians,” and that the political debate on how to respond to the “barbarians” drove the advocates of the pro-peace argument to reimagine Chosŏn’s statehood. The article consists of three parts. First, it reconstructs the philosophical foundations of the mainstream Neo-Confucian discourse (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Making Peace with the Devil: The Problem of Ending Just Wars.Elisabeth Forster & Isaac Taylor - 2023 - Journal of Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):121-137.
    In this paper, we draw attention to an unintended but severe side effect of just war thinking: the fact that it can impose barriers to making peace. Investigating historical material concerning a series of conflicts in China during the early twentieth century, we suggest that operating in a just war framework might change actors' identities and interests in a way that makes peacemaking an unavailable action. But since just war theory places significant normative constraints on how long wars can be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Defence of Jus Ad Bellum Criteria.James Pattison - 2023 - Philosophia 51 (5):2307-2315.
    In this contribution, I defend the standard list of jus ad bellum principles. In The Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War Theory, Uwe Steinhoff endorses only three principles of jus ad bellum (right intention, just cause, and proportionality) and claims that the others are redundant. I argue that, although fundamentally all jus ad bellum principles can be reduced to proportionality, in practice it is vital to retain the main jus ad bellum criteria as separate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Just War Moralities.Gabriel Palmer-Fernández - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (3):580-605.
    This essay discusses four recent books on the Western, and one book on the classical Chinese, traditions of just war. It concentrates on the jus ad bellum moral criteria, giving attention to the centrality of the state in just war morality, to some challenges in reconceptualizing the jus ad bellum in the context of non-state agents, and to controversies over a “presumption against war.”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Legacy of Christian Ethics in Comparative Religious Ethics.Sumner B. Twiss - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (4):759-772.
    This essay is an exploratory inquiry into possible Christian ethical residues in the field of comparative religious ethics (CRE), focusing particularly on the themes of tradition and canon, trajectories of ethical reflection, emancipatory criticism, common morality, and the notion of discipline. It is suggested that even if such traces exist, they may not be detrimental to the field as currently practiced.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations