- Style, substance, Newspeak 'and all that': a commentary on Murray et al. (2007) and an open challenge to Goldacre and other 'offended' apologists for EBM.Michael Loughlin - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):517-521.details
|
|
|
Reason and value: making reasoning fit for practice.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Kirstin Borgerson, Vikki Entwistle & Elselijn Kingma - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):929-937.details
|
|
|
Reconsidering rationality and ethics in the evidence‐based medicine debate: a reply to commentators.M. Gupta - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):143-146.details
|
|
|
Ethics and EBM: acknowledging bias, accepting difference and embracing politics.Ian Kerridge - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):365-373.details
|
|
|
The evidence‐based health care debate – 2006. Where are we now?Andrew Miles, Andreas Polychronis & Joseph E. Grey - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):239-247.details
|
|
|
Developments in the evidence‐based health care debate – 2004.A. Miles, J. E. Grey, A. Polychronis, N. Price & C. Melchiorri - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):129-142.details
|
|
|
A platitude too far: ‘Evidence-based ethics’. Commentary on Borry (2006), Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 306-311.Michael Loughlin - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):312-318.details
|
|
|
Blinded by ‘science’: Commentary on Jenicek, M. (2006) ‘The hard art of soft science’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 410-419. [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):423-426.details
|
|
|
Current thinking in the evidence‐based health care debate.A. Miles, J. E. Grey, A. Polychronis, N. Price & C. Melchiorri - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):95-109.details
|
|
|
Evidence‐based healthcare, clinical knowledge and the rise of personalised medicine.Andrew Miles, Michael Loughlin & Andreas Polychronis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):621-649.details
|
|
|
Science: a limited source of knowledge and authority in the care of patients*. A Review and Analysis of: ‘How Doctors Think. Clinical Judgement and the Practice of Medicine.’Montgomery, K. [REVIEW]Andrew Miles - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):545-563.details
|
|
|
Framing the EBM debate: a commentary on Saad (2008).Michael Loughlin - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):653-655.details
|
|
|
The future for medical epistemology? Commentary on Tonelli (2006), Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 248-256.Michael Loughlin - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):289-291.details
|
|
|
The basis of medical knowledge: judgement, objectivity and the history of ideas.Michael Loughlin - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):935-940.details
|
|
