Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A proposal to establish an office of healthcare education in ethics and law (HEEAL).Connie Zuckerman & Stuart F. Spicker - 1994 - HEC Forum 6 (3):127-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethnicity and Advance Care Directives.Sheila T. Murphy, Joycelynne M. Palmer, Stanley Azen, Gelya Frank, Vicki Michel & Leslie J. Blackhall - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (2):108-117.
    Advance care directives for health care have been promoted as a way to improve end-of-life decision making. These documents allow a patient to state, in advance of incapacity, the types of medical treatments they would like to receive, to name a surrogate to make those decisions, or to do both. Although studies have shown that both physicians and patients generally have positive attitudes about the use of these documents, relatively few individuals have actually completed one.What underlies this discrepancy between attitudes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Responding to ethical dilemmas in nursing homes: Do we always need an “ethicist”? [REVIEW]David A. Fleming - 2007 - HEC Forum 19 (3):245-259.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Comparison of patients' and health care professionals' attitudes towards advance directives.D. Blondeau, P. Valois, E. W. Keyserlingk, M. Hébert & M. Lavoie - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):328-335.
    OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to identify and compare the attitudes of patients and health care professionals towards advance directives. Advance directives promote recognition of the patient's autonomy, letting the individual exercise a certain measure of control over life-sustaining care and treatment in the eventuality of becoming incompetent. DESIGN: Attitudes to advance directives were evaluated using a 44-item self-reported questionnaire. It yields an overall score as well as five factor scores: autonomy, beneficence, justice, external norms, and the affective dimension. SETTING: (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations