Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Classical versus quantum ontology.P. Busch - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):517-539.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Measurement and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory.W. M. De Muynck - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):293 - 318.
    The axiomatic approaches of quantum mechanics and relativity theory are compared with approaches in which the theories are thought to describe readings of certain measurement operations. The usual axioms are shown to correspond with classes of ideal measurements. The necessity is discussed of generalizing the formalisms of both quantum mechanics and relativity theory so as to encompass more realistic nonideal measurements. It is argued that this generalization favours an empiricist interpretation of the mathematical formalisms over a realist one.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nonideal quantum measurements.Hans Martens & Willem M. de Muynck - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (3):255-281.
    A partial ordering in the class of observables (∼ positive operator-valued measures, introduced by Davies and by Ludwig) is explored. The ordering is interpreted as a form of nonideality, and it allows one to compare ideal and nonideal versions of the same observable. Optimality is defined as maximality in the sense of the ordering. The framework gives a generalization of the usual (implicit) definition of self-adjoint operators as optimal observables (von Neumann), but it can, in contrast to this latter definition, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)Measurement and the interpretation of quantum mechanics and relativity theory.W. M. de Muynck - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):293-318.
    The axiomatic approaches of quantum mechanics and relativity theory are compared with approaches in which the theories are thought to describe readings of certain measurement operations. The usual axioms are shown to correspond with classes of ideal measurements. The necessity is discussed of generalizing the formalisms of both quantum mechanics and relativity theory so as to encompass more realistic nonideal measurements. It is argued that this generalization favours an empiricist interpretation of the mathematical formalisms over a realist one.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A concrete procedure for obtaining sharp reconstructions of unsharp observables in finite-dimensional quantum mechanics.Gianpiero Cattaneo, Tiziana Marsico, Giuseppe Nisticò & Guido Bacciagaluppi - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (10):1323-1343.
    We discuss the problem of how a (commutative) generalized observable in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space (communtative effect-valued resolution of the identity) can be considered as an unsharp realization of some standard observable (projection-valued resolution of the identity). In particular, we give a concrete procedure for constructing such a standard observable. Some results about the “uniqueness” of the resulting observable are also examined.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can we escape from Bell's conclusion that quantum mechanics describes a non-local reality?Willem M. de Muynck - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (3):315-330.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark