Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Abject Ontologies: Cancer and ‘Living On’.Nadine Ehlers & Shiloh Krupar - 2022 - Journal of Medical Humanities 43 (3):455-466.
    This paper examines cancer through the lens of abjection. While cancer can be understood as an abject lifeform, we explore what we name the abject ontologies created through both cancer detection technologies/practices and cancer treatment, specifically the drug combination Adriamycin and Cytoxan. We ask: what are the abject ontologies produced through living with and living on from cancer diagnosis and treatment? Our concern is to map how cancer undoes our supposedly stable categories inherited from modernist logic, challenges our very ideas (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why John Stuart mill would support restriction on dtc marketing of genetic tests.Joan L. McGregor - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):9 – 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Genetic testing for vulnerable populations: What kinds of communication we need and do not need.Dean Schillinger & Daniel Dohan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):12 – 14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dtc marketing of genetic tests: The perfect storm.Audrey Chapman - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):10 – 12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consumer alert: Ethical issues raised by the sale of genetic tests directly to consumers.Katherine Wasson - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):16 – 18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Why autonomy needs help.Arthur L. Caplan - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):301-302.
    Some argue that to be effective in healthcare settings autonomy needs to be strengthened. The author thinks autonomy is fundamentally inadequate in healthcare settings and requires supplementation by experience-based paternalism on the part of doctors and healthcare providers.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Ask your doctor if this genetic test is right for you.Howard Brody - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):1 – 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dtc genetic services: A look across the pond.Pascal Borry & Heidi Howard - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):14 – 16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • 23andMe: a new two-sided data-banking market model.Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Marie-France Mamzer-Bruneel, Guillaume Vogt & Christian Hervé - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundSince 2006, the genetic testing company 23andMe has collected biological samples, self-reported information, and consent documents for biobanking and research from more than 1,000,000 individuals, through a direct-to-consumer online genetic-testing service providing a genetic ancestry report and a genetic health report. However, on November 22, 2013, the Food and Drug Administration halted the sale of genetic health testing, on the grounds that 23andMe was not acting in accordance with federal law, by selling tests of undemonstrated reliability as predictive tests for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Using lessons learned from brca testing and marketing: What lies ahead for whole genome scanning services.Michelle L. McGowan & Jennifer R. Fishman - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):18 – 20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations