Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Philosophical Acts of Wonder in Bioethics.Alexander Zhang - 2024 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 49 (3):221-232.
    Two sources of possible disagreement in bioethics may be associated with pessimism about what bioethics can achieve. First, pluralism implies that bioethics engages with interlocutors who hold divergent moral beliefs. Pessimists might believe that these disagreements significantly limit the extent to which bioethics can provide normatively robust guidance in relevant areas. Second, the interdisciplinary nature of bioethics suggests that interlocutors may hold divergent views on the nature of bioethics itself—particularly its practicality. Pessimists may suppose that interdisciplinary disagreements could frustrate the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Suicide.Michael Cholbi - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • “Terminal Anorexia”, Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity.Anneli Jefferson - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-12.
    Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this refusal potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of “terminal anorexia” suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician-assisted suicide might be justified. The author argues that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reasoning about Death in Biomedical Decision-Making.Jeremy Weissman - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):331-344.
    Depending on our mode of reasoning—moral, prudential, instrumental, empirical, dialectical, and so on—we may come to vastly different conclusions on the nature of death and the appropriate orientation toward matters such as euthanasia or procuring organs from brain-dead patients. These differing orientations have resulted in some of the most enduring conflicts in biomedical decision-making with roots in the earliest strands of philosophical discourse. Through continually grappling with questions over matters of death, we continually step closer to clarity, even if certainty (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Meaning of life as a resource for coping with psychological crisis: Comparisons of suicidal and non-suicidal patients.Olga Kalashnikova, Dmitry Leontiev, Elena Rasskazova & Olga Taranenko - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:957782.
    IntroductionMeaning is an important psychological resource both in situations of accomplishment and in situations of ongoing adversity and psychological crisis. Meaning in life underlies the reasons for staying alive both in everyday and in critical circumstances, fulfilling a buffering function with respect to life adversities.AimThe aim of the present study was to reveal the role of both meaningfulness, including specific sources of meaning and reasons for living, and meaninglessness (alienation) in patients suffering from profound crisis situations with or without suicidal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark