Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Higher-order preferences and the master rationality motive.Keith E. Stanovich - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (1):111 – 127.
    The cognitive critique of the goals and desires that are input into the implicit calculations that result in instrumental rationality is one aspect of what has been termed broad rationality (Elster, 1983). This cognitive critique involves, among other things, the search for rational integration (Nozick, 1993)—that is, consistency between first-order and second-order preferences. Forming a second-order preference involves metarepresentational abilities made possible by mental decoupling operations. However, these decoupling abilities are separable from the motive that initiates the cognitive critique itself. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Explaining bias with bias.Krzysztof Przybyszewski, Dorota Rutkowska & Michał Białek - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e237.
    Bermúdez argues that a framing effect is rational, which will be true if one accepts that the biased editing phase is rational. This type of rationality was called procedural by Simon. Despite being procedurally rational in the evaluation phase framing effect stems from biased way we set a reference point against which outcomes are compared.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Thinking about complex decisions: How sleep and time-of-day influence complex choices.Todd McElroy & David L. Dickinson - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 76 (C):102824.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cognitive Style and Frame Susceptibility in Decision-Making.David R. Mandel & Irina V. Kapler - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:375475.
    The susceptibility of decision-makers’ choices to variations in option framing has been attributed to individual differences in cognitive style. According to this view, individuals who are prone to a more deliberate, or less intuitive, thinking style are less susceptible to framing manipulations. Research findings on the topic, however, have tended to yield small effects, with several studies also being limited in inferential value by methodological drawbacks. We report two experiments that examined the value of several cognitive-style variables, including measures of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared.Florian Loffing, Stefanie Nickel & Norbert Hagemann - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Intuitive And Reflective Responses In Philosophy.Nick Byrd - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Colorado
    Cognitive scientists have revealed systematic errors in human reasoning. There is disagreement about what these errors indicate about human rationality, but one upshot seems clear: human reasoning does not seem to fit traditional views of human rationality. This concern about rationality has made its way through various fields and has recently caught the attention of philosophers. The concern is that if philosophers are prone to systematic errors in reasoning, then the integrity of philosophy would be threatened. In this paper, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations