Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: The Dialectical Rand.Chris Matthew Sciabarra - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):321-357.
    Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (July 2015), and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand (2016). Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend “dialectical libertarianism,” which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues.Roger E. Bissell - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):306-320.
    The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of “dialectics,” which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations