Switch to: References

Citations of:

XII. Aristotle’s Demonstrations and Euclid’s Elements

In Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton University Press. pp. 144-163 (1992)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hobbes on the Order of Sciences: A Partial Defense of the Mathematization Thesis.Zvi Biener - 2016 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):312-332.
    Accounts of Hobbes’s ‘system’ of sciences oscillate between two extremes. On one extreme, the system is portrayed as wholly axiomtic-deductive, with statecraft being deduced in an unbroken chain from the principles of logic and first philosophy. On the other, it is portrayed as rife with conceptual cracks and fissures, with Hobbes’s statements about its deductive structure amounting to mere window-dressing. This paper argues that a middle way is found by conceiving of Hobbes’s _Elements of Philosophy_ on the model of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reply to Bronstein, Leunissen, and Beere.Marko Malink - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):748-762.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Internal Applications and Puzzles of the Applicability of Mathematics.Douglas Bertrand Marshall - 2024 - Philosophia Mathematica 32 (1):1-20.
    Just as mathematics helps us to represent and reason about the natural world, in its internal applications one branch of mathematics helps us to represent and reason about the subject matter of another. Recognition of the close analogy between internal and external applications of mathematics can help resolve two persistent philosophical puzzles concerning its applicability: a platonist puzzle arising from the abstractness of mathematical objects; and an empiricist puzzle arising from mathematical propositions’ lack of empirical factual content. In order to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark