Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Metontology and Heidegger’s concern for the ontic after being and time: challenging the a priori.Cristina Crichton - 2022 - Trans/Form/Ação 45 (3):33-58.
    Resumo: A Kehre (viragem) no pensamento de Heidegger foi amplamente discutida e debatida. A introdução da noção de metontologia (Metontologie), em 1927, informou proveitosamente esse debate, uma vez que implica uma preocupação com o domínio ôntico, por parte de Heidegger, que não está presente em trabalhos anteriores. O fato de essa noção desaparecer logo após ser introduzida, porém, desafia sua contribuição para esse debate. Neste artigo, mostra-se que o desaparecimento da metontologia não significa o desaparecimento da preocupação de Heidegger com (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Heidegger, Technology and Education.Kurt C. M. Mertel - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (2):467-486.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Metontology , moral particularism, and the “art of existing:” A dialogue between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams. [REVIEW]Lauren Freeman - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):545-568.
    An important shift occurs in Martin Heidegger’s thinking one year after the publication of Being and Time , in the Appendix to the Metaphysical Foundations of Logic . The shift is from his project of fundamental ontology—which provides an existential analysis of human existence on an ontological level—to metontology . Metontology is a neologism that refers to the ontic sphere of human experience and to the regional ontologies that were excluded from Being and Time. It is within metontology, Heidegger states, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Two ways of being a left-Heideggerian: The crossroads between political and social ontology.Kurt C. M. Mertel - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (9):966-984.
    This article is concerned with the question of the relative priority between political and social ontology within left-Heideggerianism, a tradition recently reconstructed by Oliver Marchart. Although the title seems to imply that this question is an open and live one within left-Heideggerianism – that the two paths at the crossroads have been clearly delineated when, in fact, the current predicament of left-Heideggerianism resembles more a one-way street – this is somewhat misleading: the identification of left-Heideggerianism with a post-foundationalist political ontology (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation